Re: [gnso-acc-sgb] Blended proposal

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

There already is an open standard that could be used with the name
crisp/iris.

Best,

tom

Am 30.05.2007 schrieb Dan Krimm:
> At 9:01 AM -0400 5/30/07, Milton Mueller wrote:
> 
> >There are also some important missing elements in the proposal.
> >* Who would establish this query-screening process: ICANN?
> >* How would the centralized database be established?
> 
> 
> Yes.
> 
> With regard to a general solution, I had envisioned that it might be
> possible to organize an open source project to do this, with coordination
> resources hired at ICANN (one or at the most two full-time positions filled
> by experienced open-source manager(s)?).
> 
> Advantages of open source:
>  - a single standard of interoperability
>  - reduced development costs (though perhaps slightly extended timeline)
>  - no purchase/license costs to (LEA, etc.) users
>  - high security level (many eyeballs looking over the code for flaws)
> 
> Audit trail databases might be segmented according to jurisdiction, with
> interoperability between jurisdictions.  Ideally, there would be separate
> jurisdictions for audit oversight/enforcement vs. query-approval authority.
> 
> Again, just blue-skying here, fully open to improvement suggestions.
> 
> See you on the call soon.
> 
> Dan
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w