ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process
  • From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 20:45:15 +0200


On May 25, 2010, at 8:35 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> Thanks Bill for getting this moving and thanks Caroline for your edits.
> I added some suggested edits.

Chuck, the doc you attached is the old one from the accountability transparent 
team.  Luckily the edits from you shown are from February, so I think you just 
attached the wrong one rather than editing the wrong one.  Please send along 
your edits of today's version....
> Chuck
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of Caroline Greer
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:14 AM
>> To: William Drake; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process
>> Thanks Bill. I just caught a few small typos - revisions attached.

Thanks for catching these, as I said I was rushing. First one was a whopper.  
2nd and 3rd we are two people divided by a common language, but I'll roll with 
whatever the group sense is. 4th and 5th agreed.

Chuck, I guess edit this version and resend?



>> We seem to have relaxed the gender diversity requirement? We
> previously
>> said no more than 2/3 coming from one gender and now we are saying the
>> applicants can't all be of the one gender. That change is fine by me
>> but I just wondered if I had missed that discussion somewhere along
> the
>> way.
>> Are we expecting the Council to be ready to vote on additional
>> candidates if the diversity needs piece kicks in? It strikes me that
>> some preparation might need to be done if that need arises as I don't
>> know if Councilors would be ready to vote on the call straight away.
>> Perhaps we can avoid this difficulty by doing some prep work
> beforehand
>> to figure out who will end up as being endorsed......or we see how we
>> get on and if some folks aren't ready, we do a quick follow up Council
>> call?
>> Caroline.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of William Drake
>> Sent: 25 May 2010 14:22
>> To: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process
>> Hi,
>> Sorry, I'm really swamped with other stuff, so the attached was
> drafted
>> fairly quickly and may need some fine tuning of language.  But we
>> needed somewhere to start, and I think it captures the points people
>> have raised in moving toward a simplified model; let me know if not.
>> Let's tinker and tweak and then get it off to the SGs for buy-in.
>> Thanks,
>> Bill
> <AoC RTs Process for GNSO Endorsements with Drake and Gomes edits.doc>

William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
 Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy