RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process
Thanks for catching that Bill. Here is the correct one. Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 2:45 PM > To: Gomes, Chuck > Cc: Caroline Greer; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process > > Hi > > On May 25, 2010, at 8:35 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote: > > > Thanks Bill for getting this moving and thanks Caroline for your > edits. > > I added some suggested edits. > > Chuck, the doc you attached is the old one from the accountability > transparent team. Luckily the edits from you shown are from February, > so I think you just attached the wrong one rather than editing the > wrong one. Please send along your edits of today's version.... > > > > Chuck > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr- > dt@xxxxxxxxx] > >> On Behalf Of Caroline Greer > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:14 AM > >> To: William Drake; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process > >> > >> Thanks Bill. I just caught a few small typos - revisions attached. > > Thanks for catching these, as I said I was rushing. First one was a > whopper. 2nd and 3rd we are two people divided by a common language, > but I'll roll with whatever the group sense is. 4th and 5th agreed. > > Chuck, I guess edit this version and resend? > > Best, > > Bill > > >> > >> We seem to have relaxed the gender diversity requirement? We > > previously > >> said no more than 2/3 coming from one gender and now we are saying > the > >> applicants can't all be of the one gender. That change is fine by me > >> but I just wondered if I had missed that discussion somewhere along > > the > >> way. > >> > >> > >> Are we expecting the Council to be ready to vote on additional > >> candidates if the diversity needs piece kicks in? It strikes me that > >> some preparation might need to be done if that need arises as I > don't > >> know if Councilors would be ready to vote on the call straight away. > >> Perhaps we can avoid this difficulty by doing some prep work > > beforehand > >> to figure out who will end up as being endorsed......or we see how > we > >> get on and if some folks aren't ready, we do a quick follow up > Council > >> call? > >> > >> Caroline. > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr- > dt@xxxxxxxxx] > >> On Behalf Of William Drake > >> Sent: 25 May 2010 14:22 > >> To: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Sorry, I'm really swamped with other stuff, so the attached was > > drafted > >> fairly quickly and may need some fine tuning of language. But we > >> needed somewhere to start, and I think it captures the points people > >> have raised in moving toward a simplified model; let me know if not. > >> > >> Let's tinker and tweak and then get it off to the SGs for buy-in. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Bill > > > > <AoC RTs Process for GNSO Endorsements with Drake and Gomes > edits.doc> > > *********************************************************** > William J. Drake > Senior Associate > Centre for International Governance > Graduate Institute of International and > Development Studies > Geneva, Switzerland > william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html > *********************************************************** > Attachment:
AoC RT GNSO Endorsement of Nominees v 1 with Gomes & Greer edits.doc
|