RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

As Bill noted.  Delete this.  I just sent the correct one.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 2:35 PM
> To: Caroline Greer; William Drake; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process
> 
> Thanks Bill for getting this moving and thanks Caroline for your
edits.
> I added some suggested edits.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-
> dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Caroline Greer
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:14 AM
> > To: William Drake; gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process
> >
> > Thanks Bill. I just caught a few small typos - revisions attached.
> >
> > We seem to have relaxed the gender diversity requirement? We
> previously
> > said no more than 2/3 coming from one gender and now we are saying
> the
> > applicants can't all be of the one gender. That change is fine by me
> > but I just wondered if I had missed that discussion somewhere along
> the
> > way.
> >
> >
> > Are we expecting the Council to be ready to vote on additional
> > candidates if the diversity needs piece kicks in? It strikes me that
> > some preparation might need to be done if that need arises as I
don't
> > know if Councilors would be ready to vote on the call straight away.
> > Perhaps we can avoid this difficulty by doing some prep work
> beforehand
> > to figure out who will end up as being endorsed......or we see how
we
> > get on and if some folks aren't ready, we do a quick follow up
> Council
> > call?
> >
> > Caroline.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-
> dt@xxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of William Drake
> > Sent: 25 May 2010 14:22
> > To: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gnso-arr-dt] Draft permanent RT endorsement process
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry, I'm really swamped with other stuff, so the attached was
> drafted
> > fairly quickly and may need some fine tuning of language.  But we
> > needed somewhere to start, and I think it captures the points people
> > have raised in moving toward a simplified model; let me know if not.
> >
> > Let's tinker and tweak and then get it off to the SGs for buy-in.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bill