RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Private WIKI for Consensus group

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Who is digging trenches Milton?  What does the use of a Wiki have to do with 
digging trenches?

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Milton L Mueller
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 2:45 PM
> To: Avri Doria; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Private WIKI for Consensus group
> 
> 
> I'm getting a bit worried about the level of trench-digging 
> and long-term preparation that seems to be going on. My 
> understanding is that we have a pretty simple problem: come 
> to an agreement on the voting distribution on the new GNSO 
> Council. It basically involves attaching acceptable numbers 
> to the 4 constituencies (or three constituencies, if that 
> idea survives) and (if it still is part of the agreement) to 
> Nomcom appointees. 
> 
> We're not drafting constitutions, we're not rewriting the 
> GNSO PDP process or bylaws. We're supposed to go back to the 
> Board with numbers attached to constituencies, right? And say 
> to them, "we agree on this, you work out the details." 
> Perhaps those numbers will be decorated with some curlicues 
> like an agreement that users and suppliers get one GNSO Board 
> seat, but I hope we're not getting more complicated than that. 
> 
> We have now 24 days.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus- 
> > wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:03 PM
> > To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Private WIKI for Consensus group
> > 
> > 
> > hi,
> > 
> > i think i wiki might be useful if people are comfortable using it.
> > 
> > and i agree this is not part of the GNSO process, but part of an 
> > extraordinary board process.  i am, however, comfortable 
> going either 
> > way with it.
> > 
> > one way to go might be to make it public after all is said 
> and done so 
> > people can see how the sausage was made.  this would go for the 
> > mailing list too.
> > 
> > but again i am comfortable either way.
> > 
> > a.
> > 
> > On 1 Jul 2008, at 18:36, <tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx> 
> > <tony.ar.holmes@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > Chuck
> > >
> > > I'm not sure that'll be helpful in this case. Whilst we 
> all need to 
> > > take soundings from our constituent's this could result 
> in full mail 
> > > boxes as well as enabling people outside of the 
> discussion to adopt 
> > > strong lobbying opinions without understanding the full 
> background.
> > >
> > > I see no reason why this exercise should be constrained by GNSO 
> > > practices at this stage. It reports to the Board, not the GNSO.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Tony
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> > > [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-
> > wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > > ] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> > > Sent: 01 July 2008 16:37
> > > To: Glen de Saint Géry; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Private WIKI for Consensus group
> > >
> > >
> > > To be consentent with recent GNSO practices it probably 
> would be a 
> > > good idea to give public read-only access and group members read/ 
> > > write access.  But maybe we should let the group decide on that.
> > >
> > > Chuck
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> > >> [mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Glen de 
> > >> Saint Géry
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 6:15 AM
> > >> To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > >> Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] Private WIKI for Consensus group
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Dear All,
> > >>
> > >> Would you like a private WIKI, that is one that can only be read 
> > >> and edited by members of the group, set up for the group's work?
> > >>
> > >> Let me know.
> > >> Thank you very much.
> > >>
> > >> Glen
> > >>
> > >> Glen de Saint Géry
> > >> GNSO Secretariat
> > >> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> http://gnso.icann.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> 
> 
>