RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] FW: Discussion paper

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Philip for the thought you put into this.  I inserted some comments and 
questions in the attached file.  I still think it would be good for us to first 
focus on the concerns of users and contracted parties to make sure we have 
common understanding there (your items 1 and 2.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry
        Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 5:34 AM
        To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] FW: Discussion paper
        
        

         

        
________________________________


        From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@xxxxxx] 
        Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:14 AM
        To: 'gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx'
        Subject: Discussion paper

        As discussed briefly on Council it may be helpful to list what seems to 
have arisen as the concerns that constituencies have with regard to change in 
GNSO structure. It would be helpful to validate this list with the group in 
order to work at solutions that address the concerns. Some options are also 
mentioned that may be worth discussing. 

        Please see the attached paper.

         

         

        Philip

Attachment: GNSO Structure Options paper consensus wg with Gomes comments 3 Jul 08.doc
Description: GNSO Structure Options paper consensus wg with Gomes comments 3 Jul 08.doc