RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Theoretical options

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Milton,
 
Note that there were a few majority calculation errors so I inserted an
Excel formula to do the calculations.  Please check the calculations to
make sure my formulas work correctly.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
        Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:16 AM
        To: Philip Sheppard; gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Theoretical options
        
        

        Here's Philip's chart with all the "not gonna be acceptable
under any circumstances" options removed. 

         

        
________________________________


        From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
        Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 5:13 AM
        To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] Theoretical options

         

        The attached excel chart may help us all assess various voting /
seats scenarios.

        It has 16 options but is not exhaustive.

         

        I submit it in the interests of debate and am not taking a
position on any option here listed or not.

         

        Philip

Attachment: Copy of Actualk GNSO reform options 2008 with majority formulas.xls
Description: Copy of Actualk GNSO reform options 2008 with majority formulas.xls