Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Theoretical options v3
At 10/07/2008 05:52 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
On 10 Jul 2008, at 09:30, Philip Sheppard wrote:My thanks to Alan for correcting me on simple majorities and the typo. I attach a corrected version incorporating NCUC position stated by Milton. Philip <GNSO reform options 2008v2.xls>interesting chart. i added a chart at the bottom that showed the percentages - kept the coloring for MM's unacceptables, but not adding any other color shading. a.
And I have added the number of votes that it takes to defeat a motion. Particularly interesting is whether a particular constituency (or group of them) can effectively veto a motion.
GNSO reform options 2008v2-percent-ag.xls