Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Theoretical options v3

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

At 10/07/2008 05:52 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> On 10 Jul 2008, at 09:30, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> > My thanks to Alan for correcting me on simple majorities and the typo.
> > I attach a corrected version incorporating NCUC position stated by
> > Milton.
> >
> > Philip
> >
> > <GNSO reform options 2008v2.xls>
> interesting chart.
>
> i added a chart at the bottom that showed the percentages - kept the
> coloring for MM's unacceptables, but not adding any other color shading.
>
> a.
And I have added the number of votes that it takes to defeat a 
motion. Particularly interesting is whether a particular constituency 
(or group of them) can effectively veto a motion.
Alan

Attachment: GNSO reform options 2008v2-percent-ag.xls
Description: