<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Proposal for discussion July 17
- To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Proposal for discussion July 17
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:57:32 -0400
Philip,
I am curious as to why you included 'consumer protection' experts in the
list of possible areas of expertise for NomCom reps. It is my
understanding that consumer protection is outside ICANN's mission.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 11:12 AM
To: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-consensus-wg] Proposal for discussion July 17
Please find attached a proposal for discussion at our next call
July 17.
This is a compromise proposal attempting to lie within the
bounding statements made on previous calls by the constituencies.
It is sent now to allow time for constituency discussion before
our call.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|