RE: [gnso-consensus-wg] Election of Directors

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That is what I would expect Philip.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx [mailto:philip.sheppard@xxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 3:38 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: gnso-consensus-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-consensus-wg] Election of Directors
> 
> Chuck;  I almost like this but we need to adjust for some of 
> the broad association members of the BC for instance MEDEF 
> (every company in France
> vitually) ICC (every chamber of commerce worldwide), WITSA.
> maybe the "appointed reprsentative" to any constituency.
> Philip
> 
> 
> I would like to throw out another option for election of directors:
> >
> > *   At the end of the current term for Seat 14, Seats 13 and 14 both
> > may not be held by individuals who are employed by, an agent of, or 
> > receive any compensation from an ICANN-accredited registry or 
> > registrar, nor may they both be held by individuals who are 
> members of 
> > or directly involved in one of the GNSO user stakeholder groups. 
> > Either seat may be held by an individual directly involved with a 
> > contracted party or a user stakeholder group, but not both 
> at the same 
> > time, thereby fostering the theme of parity between 
> contracted and non-contracted parties.
> > *   Voting threshold: 2/3 of one house or simple majority of both
> > houses.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> 
>