RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Plans for the next few weeks

["Pascal Haddad" <phaddad@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,



First I am so glad to be part of this community!



I have one comment related to point 50, where  I believe we can use the 
EEE-PPAT database (ECOOM-EUROSTAT-EPO PATSTAT Person Augmented Table) in order 
to harmonize names and even Company names.



This work was done by EUROSTAT, within the framework of the activities 
developed by the OECD Task force on Patent Statistics, in close collaboration 
with the European Patent Office (EPO) and PATSTAT, the EPO's Worldwide Patent 
Statistical Database which contains bibliographic data, citations and family 
links of about 70 million applications of more than 80 countries.



The database and the methodology (algorithm) can be used free of charge.



Kind Regards,

Pascal Haddad

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Justine Chew 
[justine.chew@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 6:00 PM
To: Dillon, Chris
Cc: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Plans for the next few weeks

Dear Chris,

Many thanks for your reply. It is consistent with what I had thought.

As suggested, I attach herewith a modified review tool v7. My comments relate 
to lines 6, 14, 40, 50, and 72, and a spelling error correction in line 67. I 
felt the existing comments under WG Response for these lines needed further 
clarity and I have inserted some text in CAPS (also change tracked) in the 
attached copy for your/WG's consideration.

Whilst having missed the benefit of discussions on lines 22, 74, and 75 from 
today's call, in principle I am in agreement with the stated WG Response for 
line 22. I disagree with the call for mandatory transformation in line 74 and 
view IPC's comment in line 75 as a possible way forward but in respect of 
totally voluntary transformation by registrar or registrants. I am of course 
guided by the technical viability of such proposal.

That's it for now.

Regards,

Justine Chew
-----

On 9 April 2015 at 07:25, Dillon, Chris 
<c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Dear Justine,

The final version of the comment review tool will form an appendix of the final 
report and influence various sections of it. In early drafts you will be see 
which comments caused which changes.

Please raise your issues now on the list. They may duplicate some of the 
content of today’s call, especially if they refer to lines 22, 74 and 75, but 
this will save time.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599<tel:%2B44%2020%207679%201599> 
(int 31599) 
www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

From: Justine Chew 
[mailto:justine.chew@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:justine.chew@xxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: 09 April 2015 15:17

To: Dillon, Chris
Cc: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Plans for the next few weeks

Dear Chris,

My apologies for having missed the call, I only managed to log in at the tail 
end of the hour.

I heard you say that you would be circulating an updated copy of the public 
comment review tool document - I wanted to ask if this document was intended to 
be appended to the Final Report, and if yes, would it be so in the form it is 
currently presented? I had some comments about some of the "WG Response" 
entries. Perhaps I should raise them in the updated copy which will be 
circulated after this?

Thanks,

Justine Chew
-----

On 9 April 2015 at 00:24, Dillon, Chris 
<c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Dear Petter,

Thank you for your email. We are intending to run today:

Draft agenda
1. Welcome
2. Roll call
3. Statements of interest
4. Public comment review tool 
v7<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52894856/Public%20comment%20review%20tool%20TT%20Initial%20Report%20V7%20CD.doc?version=1&modificationDate=1427669802000&api=v2>
5. Review of proposed work 
plan<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52894856/T%26T_Amended_DraftWorkPlan_2.doc?version=1&modificationDate=1427670057000&api=v2>
6. AOB

Moreover, it is hoped that we will be able to circulate a first draft of the 
final report (probably missing some sections) for discussion on the 16th.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599<tel:%2B44%2020%207679%201599> 
(int 31599) 
www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

From: Petter Rindforth 
[mailto:petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: 09 April 2015 08:04
To: Dillon, Chris
Cc: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Plans for the next few weeks

Hi Chris,

Just to be sure: do we have a meeting today, or is our next meeting on April 
14??

Best,
Petter

--
Petter Rindforth, LL M

Fenix Legal KB
Stureplan 4c, 4tr
114 35 Stockholm
Sweden
Fax: +46(0)8-4631010<tel:%2B46%280%298-4631010>
Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360
E-mail: petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
www.fenixlegal.eu<http://www.fenixlegal.eu>


NOTICE
This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to 
whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged 
information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any 
of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by 
return e-mail.
Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu<http://www.fenixlegal.eu>
Thank you

2 april 2015, Dillon, Chris <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>> 
skrev:

Dear colleagues,



We weren't able to run today's meeting as there were only three participants.



I would like to suggest that we just postpone everything by one week. That 
would mean we would circulate a draft final report on 14 April.



Before our next meeting, please make sure you are happy with the workplan and 
check whether you have final amendments for

the comment review tool (see the URL below for both). So far no submissions 
have been made. If there aren't any by the end of next week's meeting we will 
assume that everyone is OK with the comments.

https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/2+April+2015



For those of you on holiday, enjoy it!



Regards,



Chris.

==

Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599<tel:%2B44%2020%207679%201599> 
(int 31599) 
ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>






<hr> <FONT style="font-size:14px" face="Calibri">

<b>- Qatar:  </b> The Patent Office announced that the filing fees, substantive 
examination fees, and accumulated annuities of patent applications filed before 
12 Jan. 2015, must be paid by 31 July 2015.  For applications filed after that 
date, the 2nd and, if due, 3rd annuities are payable at the time of filing, 
whereas substantive examination fees can be settled within six months 
thereafter.<br /><br />

<b>- Lebanon:  </b> The Ministry of Economy and Trade announced that all POA 
submissions after April 10, 2015 must be legalized by the Consulate General. 
This update will not affect applications filed prior to the aforementioned 
date. <br /><br />



For more information on this or on general IP matters in our region, please 
contact <a href="mailto:news@xxxxxxxxxx";>news@xxxxxxxxxx</a><br /><br/>




</FONT><hr>


<FONT size="1" face="Calibri"><i>The information contained in this message is 
privileged and confidential intended for the use of the individual or entity 
name above. Any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
communication by other than the intended recipient is strictly 
prohibited.</i></FONT>