Re: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] PS

[Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>]

Marie-laure,

Thanks very much. That's very helpful, especially for me the reminder of the 
retention component of the equation.

Regards,

Don

From: Marie-Laure Lemineur <mllemineur@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mllemineur@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:54 PM
To: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx<mailto:dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>>
Cc: 
"gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx>"
 
<gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] PS

Dear all,

After reading most of the documents and hearing the comments made during our 
online meetings, I tried to summarize the major legal issues that have been 
mentioned. Of course, at the center of the diagram is what is in the opinions 
of NPOC and NCUC the root of the problem.
Please see the document attached at your convenience.

I hope it helps somehow.

Best,

Marie-laure







On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Don Blumenthal 
<dblumenthal@xxxxxxx<mailto:dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>> wrote:

We also should start thinking about questions for the experts group. To anyone 
on yesterday's call, was anything decided after I left on a mechanism for 
getting answers?