<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] Re: PS
- To: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] Re: PS
- From: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:44:17 -0500
Steve,
Thanks. That's an excellent start, especially since of the the members of
the group (I'm blanking on which one right now; our coffee maker broke) is
the person who tipped me to the document. I hope he'll have more details.
All, I'll get a summary of the last two meetings out today or tomorrow as
soon as I take care of some items with imminent deadlines.
Don
On 2/20/13 7:59 PM, "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Don, I would like to propose one such question, which I first posed about
>two months ago ( see
>http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg/msg00049.html ). It
>involves the PIR Appendix U report on the transition from thin to thick
>Whois in .org.
>
>Part 3 of the report (page 30) consists of a table on "Centralized Whois
>Complaints," and indicates that few such complaints were received during
>2003
>(the period during which the transition to thick Whois for .org took
>place).
>According to the table, only six of such complaints received by PIR
>during the
>year were "relating to privacy issues." Is any detail available on these
>complaints, or do the experts have any recollections regarding them?
>Furthermore, this part of the report (and see also
>http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/registries/org/registry-agmt-appu
>-23oct02-en.htm ,
> which specifies what this report is to contain) was apparently supposed
>to be
>submitted annually ("no later than one month after each anniversary date
>after
>the Commencement-of-Service date"). I have not been able to locate on
>the
>ICANN site any such reports submitted later than June 2004. Does anyone
>know
>if this was done and if so where the reports can be found? (I
>understand that Appendix U was eliminated in the revised .org registry
>agreement that went into force in 2006, so this question targets the
>2004-06 period.)
>
>Sorry to have missed today's call but it was unavoidable.
>
>Steve Metalitz
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don
>Blumenthal
>Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:03 PM
>To: gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] PS
>
>
>We also should start thinking about questions for the experts group. To
>anyone on yesterday's call, was anything decided after I left on a
>mechanism for getting answers?
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|