RE: [gnso-dow123] Proposal Premise Presupposes Publication

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

It doesn't appear to me to be presented as a stop-gap measure. If that is
the intent, then I suggest we instead step back and consider other options
before moving forward with this recommendation.

 

Tim

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 12:34 PM
To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Proposal Premise Presupposes Publication

 

As I understand it, this recommendation is only a stop-gap measure, not the
final answer.

 

There is a commitment to continue to review the privacy issue and to come up
with a more permanent solution and a more general approach.  This
"exception" process is only for the interim.  

 

I would like to request that such an understanding be made express.  

Thanks,

Kathy


Jordyn indicates that no other options were looked at - I'd like to
press on this a bit. It appears that the task force is attempting to use
an exception based approached to deal with regional breakouts of
privacyitis. Doesn't it make much more sense to offer registrants these
types of protections on a much more global basis by enhancing the
capability of registrars and registries by implementing privacy policies
specifically targetted at individuals?