Re: [gnso-dow123] Revised draft

[Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ross Rader ha scritto:
> I don't see this as an area where a lowest common denominator approach
> actually works. On the contrary, we should be striving to accomodate the
> highest common denominator 

Whether it's lowest or highest depends on how you define the variables 
:-P but yes, we're on the same line: basically, the minimum level of 
privacy should be the one that sums all minimum levels required by all 
privacy regulations.
--
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...