ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dow123]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-dow123] Proposed revision #2

  • To: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Jordyn A. Buchanan'" <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Proposed revision #2
  • From: "David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 22:56:13 -0500

there is not agreement on a great number of subjects. The concept of tiered access is a sensible proposal even if some oppose it. The Registry Constituency will continue to support this as a recommendation for dealing with this subject


At 07:18 PM 8/31/2005, Marilyn Cade wrote:
David, I have to support Ross on this. While some may support tiered access others oppose it. The BC has agreed to examine it, without a position that they will support it. We can't put it into this as a policy recommendation. There is not agreement.


----------
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David W. Maher
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:31 PM
To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx; Jordyn A. Buchanan
Cc: Whois TF mailing list
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Proposed revision #2


As stated in the preamble:
The Task Force believes that there is an ongoing risk of conflict between a registrars or registrys legal obligations under local privacy laws and their contractual obligations to ICANN. TF2 Report, Section 2.3, http://www.gnso.icann.org/issues/whois-privacy/Whois-tf2-preliminary.html


We are looking for procedures to reduce or eliminate the conflict. If we restrict ourselves to making all (or some) data publicly available, or concealing all (or some) data, we will never reach a consensus. Tiered access as a concept is an obvious way forward to find some consensus to solve this problem.
David




At 11:55 AM 8/31/2005, Ross Rader wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 30/08/2005 5:08 PM Jordyn A. Buchanan noted that;
> This proposal is from the Registry Constituency.  It would add an
> additional paragraph to the end of the policy recommendation, as  follows:
>
> 3) Registrars and registries may use tiered access as a means of
> complying with local legal requirements when applicable.

We've not had any discussions regarding tiered access. It would be
appropriate to eliminate this from the draft and keep this discussion
off the table until we are in a position to deal with the technical and
policy issues surrounding the proposal.

- --
- --
Regards,



                       -rwr








"Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument, every utensil, every article designed for use, of each and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings." - Robert Collier


Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com My Blogware: http://www.byte.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)

iD8DBQFDFeD96sL06XjirooRApR8AJwKsJTOSOEzIoGKGn1hLYUKXmBz6wCfXjbK
7B69eqPzWPqzLOH0dCYzfEU=
=vgqi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy