RE: [gnso-dow123] Final TF report - Rec. 2 on national laws

["Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Since the NCUC paper, which includes a footnote referencing David
Maher's attack on the IPC background paper, has been included as Annex 2
of the report, I have no choice but to insist that --
 
(a)  footnote 1 of Annex 2 be supplemented to reference my August 26
reply, at http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-dow123/msg00540.html, to
David's  call for the IPC to withdraw the paper; 
 
(b) a link to the IPC paper itself be included in footnote 1 of Annex 2.
Without this it will be impossible for  the reader to make sense out of
this footnote.
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-dow123/docdNbmEz6CLT.doc 
 
Thank you.  
 
Steve Metalitz

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Maria Farrell
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 12:45 PM
To: Maria Farrell; 'Whois TF mailing list'
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Final TF report - Rec. 2 on national laws


This time with the attachment...
 
 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Maria Farrell
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 6:32 PM
To: 'Whois TF mailing list'
Subject: [gnso-dow123] Final TF report - Rec. 2 on national laws


Dear all,
 
Attached is the final version of the Final task force report on a policy
recommendation and advice on a procedure for handling conflicts between
a registrar/registry's legal obligations under privacy laws and their
contractual obligations to ICANN. 
 
I have revised the version circulated to you on Wednesday last, 19th
October for your comments.  
 
Specifically, I have incorporated the changes requested on this list by
Kathy Kleiman and David Fares. If there are no further comments in the
next 24 hours (i.e. by cob-US tomorrow, Tuesday 25th October), this
report will be submitted to the GNSO Council.
 
All the best, Maria