Re: [gnso-dow123] FOR REVIEW: Draft Preliminary Task ForceReport on the Purpose of Whois]

[Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

times 2

ken stubbs

Ross Rader wrote:

> In principle, this is fine, except that on a practical basis, we've 
> spent a lot of time getting the document this far already. My 
> preference would simply be to close this off without much further in 
> the way of drastic edits. I personally don't want to have to re-review 
> my constituencies submission to make sure that it still makes sense 
> post-edit.
>
> Milton Mueller wrote:
> > This is a reasonable suggestion. In principle, I would support 
> extracting the TOR#2 comments. However, if it causes further delay, it 
> may be better to leave it as it is.
> > Dr. Milton Mueller
> > Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> > http://www.digital-convergence.org
> > http://www.internetgovernance.org
> >
> >>>> "Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 01/08/06 2:47 PM >>>
> > One further question:  since what we are seeking comment on (the two
> > formulations) is responsive to TOR #1, not #2, is it really 
> necessary to
> > include the constituency statements on TOR#2?  If we were to drop them,
> > the preliminary report would be quite a bit shorter and (I suggest) 
> more
> > likely to be read.
> > Steve
> >
> >
> >