RE: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG)

["Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok.  I think that should be a good idea.
Edmon


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:49 PM
> To: Edmon Chung; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG)
> 
> I think that can work Edmon but it seems like we should at least provide
> some estimates for the identified tasks.  In doing so we could also
> state specifically that the group would be ongoing as needed to address
> any new issues that may be identified.  If we want a report produced
> before the meetings in Seoul we should say that and provide a high-level
> plan for accomplishing that.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung
> > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:26 PM
> > To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG)
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the edits.
> >
> > Regarding timeline, the reason for not including one is that
> > the current concept is to have an ongoing group rather than
> > one-off... It is anticipated that there may be other issues
> > that could arise.  I wonder if that might work better?...
> > The understanding though is to set a timeline to put out a
> > report on the few identified issues in time before Seoul.
> >
> > Edmon
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
> > > Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 2:00 AM
> > > To: Edmon Chung; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG)
> > >
> > > Thanks Edmon.  I made some suggested edits that are
> > highlighted in the
> > attached
> > > file.  Note that I avoided the use of the word 'policy'
> > because both
> > > SO's
> > have
> > > policy development processes that are different than this proposed
> > approach.
> > > Also, I suggested at the end that the charter should contain a
> > timeline/project plan.
> > >
> > > Because this is a joint WG, both SO's should probably
> > approve the charter.
> > A
> > > first step would be to make sure that ccNSO reps review and
> > comment on
> > > the draft charter.
> > >
> > > Chuck
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 5:20 AM
> > > > To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG)
> > > >
> > > > Hi Everyone,
> > > >
> > > > After some further discussion with Jane of CCNSO, please find
> > > > attached a draft of the charter for the JIG.
> > > >
> > > > As mentioned earlier, the purpose would be to discuss and provide
> > > > implementation and policy recommendations to ICANN
> > regarding issues
> > > > of common interest between IDN ccTLDs and IDN gTLDs.
> > > >
> > > > 2 particular conceptual features of the JIG would be:
> > > > 1. that if either SO feel that an issue is out of scope its
> > > > unilateral understanding would put the issue out of scope for the
> > > > JIG 2. that it is ongoing and will produce
> > recommendations for each
> > > > SO's council to consider from time to time
> > > >
> > > > And of course, as mentioned earlier as well, we will
> > start with the
> > > > following:
> > > > - IDN TLD length
> > > > - Variant management for TLD strings
> > > > - IDN Language table implementation at the root
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts and comments welcome...
> > > >
> > > > If we feel that this looks right, would also like to prepare a
> > > > resolution for the council to vote on at our upcoming
> > meeting (Jane
> > > > will be doing the same at the CCNSO).
> > > >
> > > > Edmon
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >