RE: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG)
Attached is an updated draft, incorporating edits suggested and a target schedule of work. Edmon > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Edmon Chung > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:46 PM > To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG) > > > Ok. I think that should be a good idea. > Edmon > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:49 PM > > To: Edmon Chung; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG) > > > > I think that can work Edmon but it seems like we should at least provide > > some estimates for the identified tasks. In doing so we could also > > state specifically that the group would be ongoing as needed to address > > any new issues that may be identified. If we want a report produced > > before the meetings in Seoul we should say that and provide a high-level > > plan for accomplishing that. > > > > Chuck > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung > > > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 10:26 PM > > > To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG) > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the edits. > > > > > > Regarding timeline, the reason for not including one is that > > > the current concept is to have an ongoing group rather than > > > one-off... It is anticipated that there may be other issues > > > that could arise. I wonder if that might work better?... > > > The understanding though is to set a timeline to put out a > > > report on the few identified issues in time before Seoul. > > > > > > Edmon > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On > > > > Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 2:00 AM > > > > To: Edmon Chung; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG) > > > > > > > > Thanks Edmon. I made some suggested edits that are > > > highlighted in the > > > attached > > > > file. Note that I avoided the use of the word 'policy' > > > because both > > > > SO's > > > have > > > > policy development processes that are different than this proposed > > > approach. > > > > Also, I suggested at the end that the charter should contain a > > > timeline/project plan. > > > > > > > > Because this is a joint WG, both SO's should probably > > > approve the charter. > > > A > > > > first step would be to make sure that ccNSO reps review and > > > comment on > > > > the draft charter. > > > > > > > > Chuck > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 5:20 AM > > > > > To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > Subject: [gnso-idng] Joint IDN WG (JIG) > > > > > > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > > > After some further discussion with Jane of CCNSO, please find > > > > > attached a draft of the charter for the JIG. > > > > > > > > > > As mentioned earlier, the purpose would be to discuss and provide > > > > > implementation and policy recommendations to ICANN > > > regarding issues > > > > > of common interest between IDN ccTLDs and IDN gTLDs. > > > > > > > > > > 2 particular conceptual features of the JIG would be: > > > > > 1. that if either SO feel that an issue is out of scope its > > > > > unilateral understanding would put the issue out of scope for the > > > > > JIG 2. that it is ongoing and will produce > > > recommendations for each > > > > > SO's council to consider from time to time > > > > > > > > > > And of course, as mentioned earlier as well, we will > > > start with the > > > > > following: > > > > > - IDN TLD length > > > > > - Variant management for TLD strings > > > > > - IDN Language table implementation at the root > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts and comments welcome... > > > > > > > > > > If we feel that this looks right, would also like to prepare a > > > > > resolution for the council to vote on at our upcoming > > > meeting (Jane > > > > > will be doing the same at the CCNSO). > > > > > > > > > > Edmon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Attachment:
JIG-charter-DRAFT2.docx
|