<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-idng] 3rd Draft on Sting Similarity
- To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] 3rd Draft on Sting Similarity
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:30:35 +0100
On 15 Dec 2009, at 20:31, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> I do not disagree with the fact that there can be visual similarity.
> What I disagree with is that visual similarity is the lowest common
> denominator.
by lowest common denominator i meant the kind of similarity we can all agree
would be included in the category 'confusingly similar'.
what do you believe is the LCD definition of confusingly similar that we can
all agree : 'yes, at least that is included'
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|