<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-idng] 3rd Draft on Sting Similarity
- To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] 3rd Draft on Sting Similarity
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:37:35 +0100
Hi,
Yes, I know you used examples that Eric had previously included, but the more I
thought about it the more uncomfortable I felt in using an example that relied
on what I consider an expansive definition of confusingly similar. Hence my
request that if we included examples, they be ones of the visually confusingly
similar type - a type I was trying to call the LCD type - but that itself ended
up confusing.
a.
On 15 Dec 2009, at 20:40, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Avri,
>
> I did not rewrite those examples; I simply made nonmaterial edits. At the
> same time, I do support leaving the examples because I think they go a long
> ways toward explaining our point. But, like I said, I am fine with adding
> other examples in addition to meaning examples.
>
> Chuck
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:50 PM
>> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] 3rd Draft on Sting Similarity
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15 Dec 2009, at 15:23, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>
>>> What in my rewrite assumes that translation is the primary
>> cause for 'confusingly similar'?
>>
>>
>> the example of "duck soup" and "鸭汤" (yā tāng) is a meaning
>> based example (assuming '鸭汤' refers to the same thing as
>> 'duck soup' and not "fooled you with a silly example")
>>
>> as i expect are:
>>
>>> .arab and an Arabic version of the same; 2) The DotAsia
>> Registry would
>>> not be allowed to offer a Chinese version of .asia;
>>
>> since they could not be consider beneficially similar if they
>> weren't also considered confusingly similar, but the
>> confusing similarity would then be based on having the same meaning.
>>
>> assuming that they are not simalar based on meaning would
>> indicate that they could be applied for without any problem.
>>
>> this is omitting the fact that because they are geographical
>> they have other issues attached to them - the geographical issues.
>>
>> a.
>>
>>
>>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|