ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-igo-ingo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Nature of the problem / Evidence of harm discussion

  • To: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Nature of the problem / Evidence of harm discussion
  • From: Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:52:51 +0100

Osvaldo,
thanks for your e-mail.

Am I correct to understand that the ISPs do not wish to see evidence of harm 
prior to moving forward considering protections?

Thanks,
Thomas

Am 12.02.2013 um 19:48 schrieb "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> 
> Sorry Thomas, I was traveling.
> In the ISPCP we discussed this point and our position is that if a sufficient 
> number of governments have given some kind of protection to these 
> organizations that should be enough for us.
> We,all know the kind of harm that could be done if they are not protected, 
> that is the reason for the RPM established, so we think there is no need for 
> proof that they have or may have suffered some kind of harm
> Best regards,
> Osvaldo
> 
> El 12/02/2013, a las 16:42, "Thomas Rickert" 
> <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>> escribi??:
> 
> 
> 
> All,
> some of you have responded to the below e-mail. May I ask those who have not 
> done so yet to please respond?
> 
> Thanks,
> Thomas
> 
> 
> Am 07.02.2013 um 21:18 schrieb Thomas Rickert 
> <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>>:
> 
>> 
>> All,
>> following up on yesterday's call I would like to ask all of you to answer 
>> either of the following questions. As you will remember, there was some 
>> debate surrounding the question if and what evidence of harm needs to be 
>> presented to the group and Chuck proposed the following questions, which I 
>> have modified a bit:
>> 
>> 1. Are there those who want to see evidence of harm before considering 
>> granting protections?
>> 
>> 2. Are there those who are requiring protections who are unwilling to 
>> provide information? If so, are you offering other or a subset of the 
>> information required according to the survey sheet.
>> 
>> Please answer the question by next Tuesday.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Thomas
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido 
> únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser 
> confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al 
> remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el 
> e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está 
> prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por 
> cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del 
> mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier 
> comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad 
> de la Información
> 
> 
> This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the 
> addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender 
> immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached 
> files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity 
> that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible 
> for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security 
> Policy.
> 






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy