<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Nature of the problem / Evidence of harm discussion
- To: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Nature of the problem / Evidence of harm discussion
- From: Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:52:51 +0100
Osvaldo,
thanks for your e-mail.
Am I correct to understand that the ISPs do not wish to see evidence of harm
prior to moving forward considering protections?
Thanks,
Thomas
Am 12.02.2013 um 19:48 schrieb "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Sorry Thomas, I was traveling.
> In the ISPCP we discussed this point and our position is that if a sufficient
> number of governments have given some kind of protection to these
> organizations that should be enough for us.
> We,all know the kind of harm that could be done if they are not protected,
> that is the reason for the RPM established, so we think there is no need for
> proof that they have or may have suffered some kind of harm
> Best regards,
> Osvaldo
>
> El 12/02/2013, a las 16:42, "Thomas Rickert"
> <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>> escribi??:
>
>
>
> All,
> some of you have responded to the below e-mail. May I ask those who have not
> done so yet to please respond?
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
>
> Am 07.02.2013 um 21:18 schrieb Thomas Rickert
> <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>>:
>
>>
>> All,
>> following up on yesterday's call I would like to ask all of you to answer
>> either of the following questions. As you will remember, there was some
>> debate surrounding the question if and what evidence of harm needs to be
>> presented to the group and Chuck proposed the following questions, which I
>> have modified a bit:
>>
>> 1. Are there those who want to see evidence of harm before considering
>> granting protections?
>>
>> 2. Are there those who are requiring protections who are unwilling to
>> provide information? If so, are you offering other or a subset of the
>> information required according to the survey sheet.
>>
>> Please answer the question by next Tuesday.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Thomas
>>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido
> únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser
> confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al
> remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el
> e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está
> prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por
> cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del
> mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier
> comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad
> de la Información
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the
> addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender
> immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached
> files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity
> that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible
> for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security
> Policy.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|