RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for IGO/INGO PDP WG

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

For the most part, Avri's suggestions seem pretty reasonable to me. I don't 
understand AD72.  Also, I think that AD86 was covered elsewhere but it is okay 
to mention it again.

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 8:33 AM
To: GNSO IGO INGO (gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Consolidated Draft of Initial Report for IGO/INGO 
PDP WG

Hi,

Finally finished my read through.
A few comments, but not many.
Again, apologies for the delay.

avri



On 5 Jun 2013, at 07:38, Avri Doria wrote:

>
>
> On 29 May 2013, at 19:38, Brian Peck wrote:
>
>> Input Deadline:  3 June 23:59 UTC
>> Next Meeting:    5 June 16:00 UTC
>>
>
>
> I missed the deadline, though I am reviewing the document.  Was hoping to at 
> least be done by the meeting, plan to attend, but don't think I will make it 
> - though will be close.
>
> But with the deadline gone, am I wasting my belated time writing comments in 
> this doc?
>
> I do apologize, but the last 3 weeks in Geneva (WTPF/IGF/HRC/WGEC) were a 
> whirlwind for me where I did not do half of things I wanted to do.  I feel 
> guilty about not getting to IGO/INGO but I didn't.
>
>
> avri
>
>
>
>
>