Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: PLEASE READ AND RESPOND ACCORDINGLY - Planning for Buenos Aires SCI Meeting

["WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Definitely right, Mary!

So far the GAC/GNSO meeting will be at this time.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- 
From: Mary Wong
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 10:30 PM
To: Julie Hedlund ; Ron Andruff ; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: PLEASE READ AND RESPOND 
ACCORDINGLY - Planning for Buenos Aires SCI Meeting
Not that this group needs the reminder, but just a note that if this is to
be an open meeting, the 15:00 time will conflict with one of the GNSO
Working Sessions (which conclude at 16:30).

Cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx

* One World. One Internet. *




-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 1:10 PM
To: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: PLEASE READ AND RESPOND
ACCORDINGLY - Planning for Buenos Aires SCI Meeting

> Ron,
>
> As per a message I sent just a little bit ago to this list, staff had to
> pick a placeholder time for the meeting because slots are getting taken
> up.  We have tentatively scheduled the SCI meeting for Sunday from
> 16:30-18:00.  We can change this to 15:00-16:30 if people wish, but as you
> note we'll need to know ASAP -- ideally today.
>
> Thanks,
> Julie
>
>
> On 10/1/13 1:07 PM, "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your input, Wolf-Ulrich.  This would suggest that a SCI
> > meeting would be best held 15:00-16:30.
> >
> > If no one is opposed to this, I would ask Julie to please put this in the
> > BA
> > calendar and mark it as an 'open' meeting for any interested party that
> > is
> > on-site who would like to attend.
> >
> > Julie: If we have not heard any disagreement within the coming 48 hours,
> > please go ahead as instructed.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > RA
> >
> > Ron Andruff
> > RNA Partners
> > www.rnapartners.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of WUKnoben
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 14:55
> > To: Avri Doria; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Planning for Buenos Aires SCI
> > Meeting
> >
> >
> > GNSO meetings on Sunday are planned so far until 16:30 - but 1. closed SG
> > meetings are scheduled from 16:30 2. usually there is a board/GAC meeting
> > scheduled later in the afternoon
> >
> > Everyone has to follow her/his preferences.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Wolf-Ulrich
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > From: Avri Doria
> > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 1:14 AM
> > To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Planning for Buenos Aires SCI
> > Meeting
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Meeting Sunday afternoon should be fine as long as it is fit into the
> > GNSO
> > Council schedule for that day.  Sundays are often rather busy.
> >
> > I think a 90 minute meeting might make sense if we can somehow schedule
> > it
> > as a way to get this committee back on track.  I feel we have lost our
> > way
> > over the last few months and need a reset.  It would also be useful to
> > have
> > an open meeting, which I assume this would be, so that others who might
> > be
> > interested in the topics could get involved.
> >
> > avri
> >
> >
> >
> > On 25 Sep 2013, at 19:06, Ron Andruff wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Julie and Committee Members,
> > >
> > > With all of the new faces on the SCI, and with Charter work to do along
> > > with the rest of the outstanding issues, I am going to suggest that we
> > > meet later in the afternoon on Sunday (prior to the Monday morning BA
> > > meeting kick-off) to allow as many members to join the meeting as
> > > possible.
> > >
> > > I also agree that a 90-minute meeting would provide us the time to get
> > > some significant work completed.
> > >
> > > How do the members feel about this approach?  Please advise.
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > >
> > > RA
> > >
> > > Ron Andruff
> > > RNA Partners
> > > www.rnapartners.com
> > >
> > > From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf OfJulie
> > > Hedlund
> > > Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 15:10
> > > To: Ron Andruff; Avri Doria
> > > Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Planning for Buenos Aires SCI Meeting
> > >
> > > Dear Ron and Avri,
> > >
> > > Staff are beginning to plan working group meetings for the ICANN
> > > meeting
> > > in Buenos Aires.  If I recall correctly on our call last week SCI
> > > members
> > > expressed interest in having a face-to-face meeting in Buenos Aires.
> > > We
> > > have typically held SCI meetings at ICANN meetings in the morning or
> > > afternoon on the Sunday of the meeting.   In this case that would be
> > > Sunday, 17 November.
> > >
> > > Do you have a preference for a morning or afternoon meeting?  Do you
> > > have
> > > meetings times you might prefer?  I think we should consider scheduling
> > > 90
> > > minutes for a meeting.
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for your assistance.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Julie
> > >
> > > Julie Hedlund, Policy Director