Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] FW: Aftermarket Perspective

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

here is my contribution to the survey (following up on my comments on the call 
today).

it would be nice to insert a line of questioning into the survey that goes 
something like this:

-- do you support the goal of rapidly returning a hijacked domain to its owner?

-- if you support the goal of rapid-return of a hijacked domain, but disagree 
with the approach taken by the WG, what approach would you suggest instead?

regarding Matt's point (about who receives the survey)...  maybe one way out 
would be to clearly state the **use** of the information gathered.  i share 
Matt's concern that we are seeking an intentionally-biased sample right now.  
so if the results of this survey are going to be the basis of determining 
policy then we need a broader sample.  but if the use of the survey is to 
inform policy-making, and it is made clear that this is not a representative 
group and their views may not prevail when balanced against the broader 
community of stakeholders, then i'd be OK going with a narrow focus.

mikey


On Sep 3, 2010, at 1:13 PM, Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger wrote:

> Thank you for your input! I will be on vacation September 7th through 15th  
> and will miss our workgroup calls during that time.
> I will coordinate with Bob on who I can start contacting in the coming week 
> anyway so that we don’t lose much additional time.
>  
> Simonetta
>  
>  
> From: Bob Mountain [mailto:bmountain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 11:38 AM
> To: Steele, Barbara; Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger
> Subject: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] FW: Aftermarket Perspective
>  
> Thanks Barbara!
> Mtn.
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/3/10 11:32 AM, "Steele, Barbara" <BSteele@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Thanks to Bob and Simonetta for pulling this together.  I think that it looks 
> very good.  I would recommend a few modifications for clarity and to solicit 
> detailed feedback vs. yes/no responses.  I have highlighted the recommended 
> modifications in red in the text below.  Thanks again for drafting this.
>  
> 
> Barbara Steele 
> Compliance Officer / Director of Policy 
> 
> From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Mountain
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 12:41 PM
> To: Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Simonetta Batteiger
> Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] FW: Aftermarket Perspective
> 
> Hello everyone, 
> On the Aug 24 call James Bladel asked Simonetta and I to gather some 
> aftermarket perspective on ETRP.   We’ve put together a list of questions and 
> a number of aftermarket cohorts.  Please feel free to reply with any comments 
> or suggestions by end of day Monday Sept 6.  We’ll begin reaching out next 
> week.
> 
> Best!
> Mtn.
>  
> 
> -- 
> Robert J. Mountain
> Vice President, Business Development
> NameMedia, Inc.
> mtn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> C: +1-508-878-0469
> O: +1-781-839-2871
> F: +1-781-839-2801

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)