RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] revised draft of the EAC language

["James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rob:

The draft language says that the human respondent should be "capable and
qualified."  Which is fairly flexible.  

It doesn't necessarily mean that this is the exclusive realm of a
Director-level employee.  Particularly if said Director has established
a internal EAC policy and trained a designated team to execute it.

J.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] revised draft of the EAC language
From: "Rob Golding" <rob.golding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, April 19, 2011 9:12 am
To: <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>


>> Although I've discussed this with some members individually, I'd like to
>> take this opportunity to go on record and state that the maximum
>> response time for an EAC should be reduced, to 4 hours.

Whilst I can understand the reasoning, I don't support the proposal -
not
all registrars will have Director level decision makers available at
such
short notice, and the more onerous you make the EAC the less likely
people
are to implement it correctly.

Rob