ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-irtpc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-irtpc] Invitation to Participate in Survey on Working Group Guidelines

  • To: "Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger" <simonetta@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpc] Invitation to Participate in Survey on Working Group Guidelines
  • From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:25:03 -0500

oooOOooo…  these are great Simonetta.

as chair of a couple of current working groups i'm gonna steal these ideas.

mikey


On Mar 11, 2013, at 2:21 PM, "Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger" <simonetta@xxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> Dear Alain & Mikey,
>  
> Want to tell you that this “fear of sounding stupid” - especially around how 
> an ICANN PDP process should work - is definitely how I felt.
> Also, to see how this multi-stakeholder approach can work (and experiencing 
> when it does work and when it does not work) has been one of the main reasons 
> for me to stick out some of the lengthy discussions in the IRTP working 
> group. So you’re definitely also on to something by identifying this as part 
> of the “glue”…
> 
> A few things that could be done:
> 1)      Actively acknowledging that “if this is your first workgroup you will 
> likely feel like you can’t contribute because you don’t want to sound 
> foolish, don’t be discouraged, we’ve all been there” => could be made part of 
> the “welcome to the working group” by the Chair or a member of staff; that 
> was never done with me, but it would have been great!
> 2)      A “newbie” can be pointed to one other more experienced member of the 
> workgroup who helps him/her along => Could be done by chair or staff
> 3)      Presenting the guideline information in a more visual form (e.g. as 
> an educational video) could help, nobody really has time to read a 20 page 
> PDF, and it leaves a new working group member with the challenge to somehow 
> figure out how and who to ask about all the stuff they did not understand 
> (which is very likely a good chunk of that guideline document if you are new 
> to the process)
> 4)      Ask newbies for feedback on all those parts they don’t understand and 
> expand on that with FAQs (asking those of us who are now familiar with the 
> topic for feedback won’t tell you if a newbie can make sense of that document)
>  
> Just a few thoughts…
> Simonetta
>  
> From: owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Ron Andruff
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 2:14 PM
> To: 'Alain Berranger'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx; 'Julie Hedlund'
> Subject: RE: [gnso-irtpc] Invitation to Participate in Survey on Working 
> Group Guidelines
>  
> Dear Alain,
>  
> Thank you for your thoughtful and informative comments.  Mikey is right when 
> he says “don’t worry, we all went through this…”.  All of the old-timers as 
> well as newcomers have experienced feeling this huge chasm of lack of 
> information and fear of speaking up for perhaps sounding foolish… And you are 
> correct to a certain extent that there is some merit in ‘growing’ in ICANN 
> through putting in the years, but with the maturing organization we have 
> today, with all the newcomers, we simply don’t have enough mentors to do the 
> job effectively. So now is a good time to address this issue and I believe 
> that the ‘tool kit’ that we – and staff – have been talking about for what 
> feels like a long time is within our grasp.
>  
> An organization can only function effectively when all members are versed in 
> the distinct language of the organization, in my view.
>  
> The other issue that you touched on made me aware that it seems to be a 
> recurring one amongst all of the volunteers of ICANN and that is our mutual 
> attraction to the great experiment of the multi-stakeholder model.  For my 
> part, that is one of the most exciting parts of ICANN and what has kept me in 
> this community for some 13 years or so.  It is obviously the same for you, 
> someone more new to the community.  So maybe you have identified ‘the glue’ 
> that brings this disparate community together… If everyone kept that element 
> at the forefront of their thoughts when engaging in ICANN work, we would 
> probably have a lot less friction in the organization and find our way to 
> more effective bottom-up decision-making.
>  
> Thanks again for bringing these ideas to light. Very helpful.
>  
> Kind regards,
>  
> RA
>  
> Ronald N. Andruff
> RNA Partners, Inc.
> From: owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Alain Berranger
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 11:16 AM
> To: Ron Andruff
> Cc: gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx; Julie Hedlund
> Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpc] Invitation to Participate in Survey on Working 
> Group Guidelines
>  
> Hi Ron,
>  
> I think the survey is just fine to improve/refine the current WG guidelines 
> (For me they do the job in the main, so I think it is more about refining). 
>  
> In my opinion and related to this, I think that what needs attention at ICANN 
> (among many things) is a broader subject than refining the WG guidelines. 
>  
> I am thinking of a more systematic manner for ICANN to get the various 
> categories of newcomers up the learning curve (I know many are working on 
> this - witness inter alia the ICANN Academy discussions - they seem to have 
> fallen of the radar!..and of course the Fellowship Program is quite effective 
> I think). 
>  
> Understanding the stakeholders' landscape and their learning needs requires a 
> thorough analysis of our various stakeholders profiles, their ICANN-related 
> motivation, and basically an understanding of their training needs. If we 
> meet those training needs (in many different ways I suppose), then we will 
> optimize the value, the reality, the sustainability and the functionning of 
> the multi-stakeholder model. Of course, I am of the school of ardent 
> supporters of the MS model as a key distinguishing feature of ICANN and maybe 
> even its key to long-term growth and sustainability. 
>  
> Indeed, I am of the opinion that participating in a WG is a great  way to 
> learn (and network to learn) but it is a time-consuming one and seen as risky 
> for many new stakeholders (time commitment, fear of the unknown and of 
> rejection, etc...). When faced with this, and after getting to know Mikey in 
> San José after having joined the IRTP-Part C WG with the view of learning, 
> Mikey told me something like: "don't be discouraged, welcome to the club, we 
> all went through this, it takes at least 2 years, etc...". Beacuse of Mikey's 
> advice, and at time mentoring, I am sticking to the plan, but sure would 
> welcome so learning opportunities a bit more structured! (Thanks Mikey for 
> all the time you have given me!). 
>  
> That said, I wonder now really if this is the better way to go... pay your 
> dues kind of argument... I think that leads to a kind of strong commitment if 
> ones sticks to the strategy, but how many do? and at what cost? 
>  
> I am of the opinion there could be a more systematic way for newcomers to go 
> through some learning modules in a certain systematic order, rather than ad 
> hoc diving in the website or wikipedia, ICANN meetings, WGs...
>  
> Cheers, Alain
> 
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you, Alain.  We appreciate your having filled in the survey and 
> providing your feedback.  At the end of the day, we are trying to ascertain 
> if the survey, as detailed, is an effective tool.  We would welcome your 
> thoughts on this question.
>  
> Kind regards,
>  
> RA
>  
> Ronald N. Andruff
> RNA Partners, Inc.
> From: owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Alain Berranger
> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 10:39 AM
> To: Ron Andruff
> Cc: gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx; Julie Hedlund
> Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpc] Invitation to Participate in Survey on Working 
> Group Guidelines
>  
> Dear Ron, dear Julie:
>  
> As you know I took the survey as a member of the SCI and see not usefulness 
> in taking it as a member of IRTP-C WG. I presume that is the correct 
> position. Let me know if you think differently.
>  
> Cheers, Alain
> 
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear IRTP-C Working Group members,
>  
> As some of you may know, the GNSO Standing Committee on Implementation 
> Improvements (SCI) has developed a survey for GNSO Working Groups, as 
> requested by the GNSO Council, to solicit feedback on the GNSO Working Group 
> Guidelines.  As Chair of the SCI, I am contacting your Working Group to 
> invite you to take the survey because you have recently completed your work 
> and, thus, may have valuable insight on the usefulness of the Working Group 
> Guidelines and suggestions for improvements.  If you would like to take the 
> survey you may wish to review the Working Group Guidelines and Summary first. 
>  Please see the following links to the documents and the survey:
>  
> Link to the Working Group Guidelines: 
> http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-08apr11-en.pdf
> Link to the Guidelines Summary: 
> http://gnso.icann.org/council/summary-gnso-wg-guidelines-06apr11-en.pdf 
> Link to Draft Survey for GNSO Working Groups: 
> http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/FFTCJPT
>  
> The SCI appreciates your consideration of this request and we ask that if you 
> wish to complete the survey please do so by **Monday, 25 March 2013.**
>  
> Thank you for your consideration.
>  
> Kind regards,
>  
> Ron Andruff
> Chair, GNSO Standing Committee on Implementation Improvements
>  
>  
>  
> Ronald N. Andruff
> RNA Partners, Inc.
>  
> 
> 
>  
> -- 
> Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
> Member, Board of Directors, CECI, http://www.ceci.ca
> Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
> Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
> NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
> Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
> O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
> Skype: alain.berranger
>  
>  
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ
> Ce courriel est confidentiel et est à l’usage exclusif du destinataire 
> ci-dessus. Toute personne qui lit le présent message sans en être le 
> destinataire, ou l’employé(e) ou la personne responsable de le remettre au 
> destinataire, est par les présentes avisée qu’il lui est strictement interdit 
> de le diffuser, de le distribuer, de le modifier ou de le reproduire, en tout 
> ou en partie . Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou si ce document vous a 
> été communiqué par erreur, veuillez nous en informer sur le champ  et 
> détruire ce courriel et toute copie de celui-ci. Merci de votre coopération.
>  
> CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE
> This e-mail message is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of 
> the addressee. Please note that, should this message be read by anyone other 
> than the addressee, his or her employee or the person responsible for 
> forwarding it to the addressee, it is strictly prohibited to disclose, 
> distribute, modify or reproduce the contents of this message, in whole or in 
> part. If the addressee cannot be reached or if you have received this e-mail 
> in error, please notify us immediately and delete this e-mail and destroy all 
> copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
>  
> 
> 
>  
> -- 
> Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
> Member, Board of Directors, CECI, http://www.ceci.ca
> Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
> Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
> NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
> Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
> O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
> Skype: alain.berranger
>  
>  
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ
> Ce courriel est confidentiel et est à l’usage exclusif du destinataire 
> ci-dessus. Toute personne qui lit le présent message sans en être le 
> destinataire, ou l’employé(e) ou la personne responsable de le remettre au 
> destinataire, est par les présentes avisée qu’il lui est strictement interdit 
> de le diffuser, de le distribuer, de le modifier ou de le reproduire, en tout 
> ou en partie . Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou si ce document vous a 
> été communiqué par erreur, veuillez nous en informer sur le champ  et 
> détruire ce courriel et toute copie de celui-ci. Merci de votre coopération.
>  
> CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE
> This e-mail message is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of 
> the addressee. Please note that, should this message be read by anyone other 
> than the addressee, his or her employee or the person responsible for 
> forwarding it to the addressee, it is strictly prohibited to disclose, 
> distribute, modify or reproduce the contents of this message, in whole or in 
> part. If the addressee cannot be reached or if you have received this e-mail 
> in error, please notify us immediately and delete this e-mail and destroy all 
> copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
>  


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP 
(ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy