<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-irtpd] RE: Feedback wanted: next week's agenda
- To: "'Lars Hoffmann'" <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-irtpd] RE: Feedback wanted: next week's agenda
- From: "Dorrain, Kristine" <kdorrain@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 19:19:45 +0000
I (and possibly some other lawyers on the call?) will be in Hong Kong next week
for the INTA meeting.
That being said, I'm a fan of wrapping up the public comment portion of the
festivities before moving on.
Kristine
From: owner-gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Lars Hoffmann
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 9:07 AM
To: gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Feedback wanted: next week's agenda
Dear all,
After consulting with James, I would like to gather some feedback on next
Monday's agenda. Once we have finished reviewing comment 28 and 29 (see my
previous email) - should we take a look at the list of IRTP definitions (sent
out last week)? Or should we re-scan the public comment review tool and the
various to-do items that have resulted from the first comb-through?
Your thoughts are much appreciated!
Very best,
Lars
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|