<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
[gnso-irtpd] RE: Feedback wanted: next week's agenda
- To: "'Lars Hoffmann'" <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>,        "gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx"	<gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>
 
- Subject: [gnso-irtpd] RE: Feedback wanted: next week's agenda
 
- From: "Dorrain, Kristine" <kdorrain@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 19:19:45 +0000
 
 
 
I (and possibly some other lawyers on the call?) will be in Hong Kong next week 
for the INTA meeting.
That being said, I'm a fan of wrapping up the public comment portion of the 
festivities before moving on.
Kristine
From: owner-gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Lars Hoffmann
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 9:07 AM
To: gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Feedback wanted: next week's agenda
Dear all,
After consulting with James, I would like to gather some feedback on next 
Monday's agenda. Once we have finished reviewing comment 28 and 29 (see my 
previous email) - should we take a look at the list of IRTP definitions (sent 
out last week)? Or should we re-scan the public comment review tool and the 
various to-do items that have resulted from the first comb-through?
Your thoughts are much appreciated!
Very best,
Lars
 
 
 
<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |