<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-lockpdp-wg] RE: For immediate review - updated definition of locking
- To: "Schneller, Matt" <Matt.Schneller@xxxxxxxxx>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] RE: For immediate review - updated definition of locking
- From: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:41:56 -0700
Dear Matt,
I shall note your apology,
Kind regards
Nathalie
From: owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Schneller, Matt
Sent: jeudi 14 mars 2013 16:29
To: Marika Konings; Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] RE: For immediate review - updated definition of
locking
Sorry to miss the call this morning without prior notice.
I don't know that I care a lot about the definition either way, but I thought
we had adopted the former definition to maintain the broadest possible range of
registrar discretion. Under the former definition, it's up to the registrar
(and the registrar's contract terms with their clients) to determine whether or
not they do anything (or even can do anything) that would impair the domain
name's resolving. Since our initial registrar survey indicated that some
registrars do disable the domain from resolving to a live website, the latter
definition might override pre-existing registrar contract terms or practice.
So long as the minimum baseline of lock (no changes of registrar or registrant)
are met, I don't know that it's of concern to anyone other than the registrar
and registrant what else that registrar does or doesn't do.
Matt
From: owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:30 AM
To: Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] For immediate review - updated definition of locking
Dear All,
We had a relatively short call today as only few people were able to join the
meeting. There was one item of substance that was discussed and we would like
to receive your feedback on by COB today (Thursday 14 March). As suggested on
the mailing list, those on the call agreed to modify the current definition of
'locking' from:
"the term "lock" means preventing any changes of registrar and registrant"
To
"the term "lock" means preventing any changes of registrar and registrant,
without impairing the resolution of the domain name"
If there are any objections to this change, please make those known to the
mailing list at the latest by close of business (wherever you are) today.
With best regards,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|