RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and conference call- Staff Support

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

SS
 
The CSG WT will need to deal with both constituency operations and stakeholder 
group operations.  The original draft charter focused solely on constituencies 
because the stakeholder group element had not yet been fully developed.  As I 
think you are aware, the SG charters are still being developed but I think 
proposed charters are available for review; none of them have been approved by 
the Board yet, nor have any of the constituency renewal requests been approved 
yet to my knowldege.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of SS Kshatriy
        Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:39 AM
        To: OSC-CSG Work Team; Olga Cavalli
        Cc: Olga Cavalli; Julie Hedlund; Glen de Saint Géry; Rob Hoggarth
        Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and conference call- Staff Support
        
        
Dear Olga,
Good to hear from you about next conference call.
1. I will need comparative statement of 'participation rules and operating 
procedures', followed by various constituencies in a tabulated/summarized form 
from the staff and also any other material they have prepared to support the 
work.
 
2. language of subtask 1.1 still remains to be resolved--constituency or 
Stakeholder group?
 
regards,
SS

--- On Tue, 4/21/09, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


        From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
        Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and conference call
        To: "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
        Cc: "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>, "Julie Hedlund" 
<jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Glen de Saint Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Rob Hoggarth" 
<robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
        Date: Tuesday, April 21, 2009, 4:51 AM
        
        
        Dear Work Team members,
         
        In preparation for our next meeting on Friday, April 24, at 1300 UTC, I 
would like to remind you of our action items and suggest an agenda for the 
meeting. 
        
        First, for our action items ICANN staff circulated a revised Draft Task 
1 Work Plan 
(https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team).  Many 
of you provided comments and agreed to participate as follows:
         
        1.     Develop recommendations for a set of participation rules and 
operating procedures, which all constituencies should abide by
        
        
        Lead: 
        S.S. Kshatriya - Individual
        
        Participants: 
        Victoria McEvedy - Intellectual Property Interests Constituency 
        Rafik Dammak - Non-Commercial Users Constituency
         
        2.     Develop recommendations for clear operating principles for each 
constituency to ensure that all constituencies function in a representative, 
open, transparent, and democratic manner
        
        
        Lead: 
        Victoria McEvedy - Intellectual Property Interests Constituency
        
        Participants: 
        Olga Cavalli - Nominating Committee Appointee 
        Rafik Dammak - Non-Commercial Users Constituency
         
        3.     Develop recommendations for creating and maintaining a database 
of all constituency members and others not formally a part of any constituency 
that is up-to-date and publicly accessible.
        
        
        Lead: 
        Krista Papac - Registrar Constituency
        
        Participants: 
        Tony Harris - Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency
         
        4.     Develop a "toolkit" of in-kind staff support and/or services for 
all constituencies 
               
        Lead: 
        Julie Hedlund - ICANN staff
        
        Participants: 
        Chuck Gomes - gTLD Registries Constituency
         
        I suggest that we review the Work Plan so that we can be prepared to 
discuss it on Friday's call.  
        
        In particular, I think it would be useful for all of us to consider how 
we might exchange information about constituencies in relation to the subtasks. 
 
        
        Also, in our last meeting we agreed that it will be very important to 
have input from all constituencies as we develop the recommendations for these 
subtasks.  Thus far, not all constituencies are represented and it could be 
very much convenient that all of them participate actively in this process.
        
         
        Finally, here is a draft agenda for Friday's meeting.  Please feel free 
to suggest any changes or additions.
         
        Meeting Agenda
         
        1.  Call to order/roll call
        2.  Draft Task 1 Work Plan
            a.  Participants from constituencies that are not represented
            b.  How to exchange information about constituencies in relations 
to subtasks
            c.  First steps and schedule for draft sub-team recommendations
        3.  Any other business
         
        Thank you and I look forward to meeting with you on Friday.
         
        Best regards,
         
        Olga