Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and conference call- Staff Support

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Chuck,
I agree with your comments.
Regards
Olga

2009/4/21 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  SS
>
> The CSG WT will need to deal with both constituency operations and
> stakeholder group operations.  The original draft charter focused solely on
> constituencies because the stakeholder group element had not yet been fully
> developed.  As I think you are aware, the SG charters are still being
> developed but I think proposed charters are available for review; none of
> them have been approved by the Board yet, nor have any of the constituency
> renewal requests been approved yet to my knowldege.
>
> Chuck
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *SS Kshatriy
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:39 AM
> *To:* OSC-CSG Work Team; Olga Cavalli
> *Cc:* Olga Cavalli; Julie Hedlund; Glen de Saint Géry; Rob Hoggarth
> *Subject:* [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and conference call- Staff Support
>
>    Dear Olga,
> Good to hear from you about next conference call.
> 1. I will need comparative statement of 'participation rules and operating
> procedures', followed by various constituencies in a tabulated/summarized
> form from the staff and also any other material they have prepared to
> support the work.
>
> 2. language of subtask 1.1 still remains to be resolved--constituency or
> Stakeholder group?
>
> regards,
> SS
>
> --- On *Tue, 4/21/09, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>* wrote:
>
> From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and conference call
> To: "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>, "Julie Hedlund" <
> jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Glen de Saint Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Rob
> Hoggarth" <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday, April 21, 2009, 4:51 AM
>
>  Dear Work Team members,
>
> In preparation for our next meeting on Friday, April 24, at 1300 UTC, I
> would like to remind you of our action items and suggest an agenda for the
> meeting.
>
> First, for our action items ICANN staff circulated a revised Draft Task 1
> Work Plan (
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team).
> Many of you provided comments and agreed to participate as follows:
>
> 1.     Develop recommendations for a set of participation rules and
> operating procedures, which all constituencies should abide by
>
> Lead:
> S.S. Kshatriya - Individual
>
> Participants:
> Victoria McEvedy - Intellectual Property Interests Constituency
> Rafik Dammak - Non-Commercial Users Constituency
>
> 2.     Develop recommendations for clear operating principles for each
> constituency to ensure that all constituencies function in a representative,
> open, transparent, and democratic manner
>
> Lead:
> Victoria McEvedy - Intellectual Property Interests Constituency
>
> Participants:
> Olga Cavalli - Nominating Committee Appointee
> Rafik Dammak - Non-Commercial Users Constituency
>
> 3.     Develop recommendations for creating and maintaining a database of
> all constituency members and others not formally a part of any constituency
> that is up-to-date and publicly accessible.
>
> Lead:
> Krista Papac - Registrar Constituency
>
> Participants:
> Tony Harris - Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency
>
> 4.     Develop a "toolkit" of in-kind staff support and/or services for all
> constituencies
>
> Lead:
> Julie Hedlund - ICANN staff
>
> Participants:
> Chuck Gomes - gTLD Registries Constituency
>
> I suggest that we review the Work Plan so that we can be prepared to
> discuss it on Friday's call.
>
> In particular, I think it would be useful for all of us to consider how we
> might exchange information about constituencies in relation to the
> subtasks.
>
> Also, in our last meeting we agreed that it will be very important to have
> i*nput from all constituencies* as we develop the recommendations for
> these subtasks.  Thus far, not all constituencies are represented and it
> could be very much convenient that all of them participate actively in this
> process.
>
> Finally, here is a draft agenda for Friday's meeting.  Please feel free to
> suggest any changes or additions.
>
> *Meeting Agenda*
>
> 1.  Call to order/roll call
> 2.  Draft Task 1 Work Plan
>     a.  Participants from constituencies that are not represented
>     b.  How to exchange information about constituencies in relations to
> subtasks
>     c.  First steps and schedule for draft sub-team recommendations
> 3.  Any other business
>
> Thank you and I look forward to meeting with you on Friday.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Olga
>
>
>