<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and conference call- Staff Support
- To: "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and conference call- Staff Support
- From: "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:26:26 +0100
Chuck and Olga and Team,
Is there a formal way of politely asking the Board to wait for our
recommendations in these regards?
Best,
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive
use of the addressee(s). This email and its attachments may also be legally
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is
created by this email communication.
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: 21 April 2009 18:36
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team; Julie Hedlund; Glen de Saint Géry;
Rob Hoggarth
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and conference call- Staff Support
Thanks Chuck,
I agree with your comments.
Regards
Olga
2009/4/21 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
SS
The CSG WT will need to deal with both constituency operations and stakeholder
group operations. The original draft charter focused solely on constituencies
because the stakeholder group element had not yet been fully developed. As I
think you are aware, the SG charters are still being developed but I think
proposed charters are available for review; none of them have been approved by
the Board yet, nor have any of the constituency renewal requests been approved
yet to my knowldege.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of SS Kshatriy
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:39 AM
To: OSC-CSG Work Team; Olga Cavalli
Cc: Olga Cavalli; Julie Hedlund; Glen de Saint Géry; Rob Hoggarth
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and conference call- Staff Support
Dear Olga,
Good to hear from you about next conference call.
1. I will need comparative statement of 'participation rules and operating
procedures', followed by various constituencies in a tabulated/summarized form
from the staff and also any other material they have prepared to support the
work.
2. language of subtask 1.1 still remains to be resolved--constituency or
Stakeholder group?
regards,
SS
--- On Tue, 4/21/09, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and conference call
To: "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>, "Julie Hedlund"
<jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Glen de Saint Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Rob Hoggarth"
<robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, April 21, 2009, 4:51 AM
Dear Work Team members,
In preparation for our next meeting on Friday, April 24, at 1300 UTC, I
would like to remind you of our action items and suggest an agenda for the
meeting.
First, for our action items ICANN staff circulated a revised Draft Task
1 Work Plan
(https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team). Many
of you provided comments and agreed to participate as follows:
1. Develop recommendations for a set of participation rules and
operating procedures, which all constituencies should abide by
Lead:
S.S. Kshatriya - Individual
Participants:
Victoria McEvedy - Intellectual Property Interests Constituency
Rafik Dammak - Non-Commercial Users Constituency
2. Develop recommendations for clear operating principles for each
constituency to ensure that all constituencies function in a representative,
open, transparent, and democratic manner
Lead:
Victoria McEvedy - Intellectual Property Interests Constituency
Participants:
Olga Cavalli - Nominating Committee Appointee
Rafik Dammak - Non-Commercial Users Constituency
3. Develop recommendations for creating and maintaining a database
of all constituency members and others not formally a part of any constituency
that is up-to-date and publicly accessible.
Lead:
Krista Papac - Registrar Constituency
Participants:
Tony Harris - Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency
4. Develop a "toolkit" of in-kind staff support and/or services for
all constituencies
Lead:
Julie Hedlund - ICANN staff
Participants:
Chuck Gomes - gTLD Registries Constituency
I suggest that we review the Work Plan so that we can be prepared to
discuss it on Friday's call.
In particular, I think it would be useful for all of us to consider how
we might exchange information about constituencies in relation to the subtasks.
Also, in our last meeting we agreed that it will be very important to
have input from all constituencies as we develop the recommendations for these
subtasks. Thus far, not all constituencies are represented and it could be
very much convenient that all of them participate actively in this process.
Finally, here is a draft agenda for Friday's meeting. Please feel free
to suggest any changes or additions.
Meeting Agenda
1. Call to order/roll call
2. Draft Task 1 Work Plan
a. Participants from constituencies that are not represented
b. How to exchange information about constituencies in relations
to subtasks
c. First steps and schedule for draft sub-team recommendations
3. Any other business
Thank you and I look forward to meeting with you on Friday.
Best regards,
Olga
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|