Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Action Items: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April 2009

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Victoria,
I just changed you name for Veronica in my last email, my apologies!
Have a nice weekend!
Regards
Olga

2009/4/24 Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Hi,
> Dear Veronica, could you please clarfy to me your last message?
> I do not understand it.
> Best regards and thanks in advance
> Olga
>
> 2009/4/24 Victoria McEvedy <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>>  Without being pedantic is having a main points of discussion section as
>> we have below a usual practice? There is a danger these summaries will stand
>> in for Minutes without being minutes and I understand the full recording is
>> posted online? I think we would all like to avoid editing/agreeing this sort
>> of thing but I don’t agree with the scope/characterization of some of the
>> wording—but is it important? Apologies in advance.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Victoria McEvedy
>>
>> Principal
>>
>> McEvedys
>>
>> *Solicitors** and Attorneys *
>>
>> [image: cid:669FC637-760A-4D2F-B56E-2C180C1870CC]
>>
>>
>>
>> 96 Westbourne Park Road
>>
>> London
>>
>> W2 5PL
>>
>>
>>
>> T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
>>
>> F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
>>
>> M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169
>>
>> * *
>>
>> *www.mcevedy.eu  ***
>>
>> Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
>>
>> This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
>> exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also
>> be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us
>> know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without
>> reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
>>
>> This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer
>> is created by this email communication.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Julie Hedlund
>> *Sent:* 24 April 2009 17:41
>> *To:* OSC-CSG Work Team
>> *Subject:* [gnso-osc-csg] Action Items: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April 2009
>> Meeting
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Work Team Members,
>>
>>
>>
>> For your review and consideration, the following are suggested action
>> items and main points of discussion from today's meeting.  I welcome your
>> questions and comments.  These also are posted on the wiki at:
>> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
>> Also, please note that *the* *next meeting will be held on Friday, May 8
>> at 1300 UTC.*
>>
>>
>>
>> *Meeting Action Items:*
>>
>> 1.  Draft Task 1 Work Plan:
>>
>> -- Julie will review constituency and stakeholder group charters and
>> indicate which contain the criteria listed in subtasks 1, 2, and 3 of the
>> Task 1 Work Plan.
>>
>> -- Work Team members will use the table to determine possible areas of
>> concern/conflict as recommendations are developed for each of the Task 1
>> subtasks.
>>
>> 2.  Board resolution on Constituency Renewal Process -- Rob Hoggarth will
>> provide information pertaining to the Board resolution on the Constituency
>> Renewal Process.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Main Points of Discussion:*
>>
>> 1.  Staff support
>>
>> -- Discussed procedures for requesting support and the need to coordinate
>> requests to ensure all Work Team needs are addressed.
>>
>> -- Emphasized the commitment by staff to support the Work Team as
>> described in the Charter: *"*V. STAFF SUPPORT The ICANN Staff assigned to
>> the work team will fully support the work of the teams as directed by the
>> Chair including meeting support, document drafting, editing and distribution
>> and other substantive contributions when appropriate."
>>
>> -- Staff suggested an action item, to which the team agreed, to produce
>> preliminary information to address subtasks 1, 2, and 3 as described above.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2.  Text of Task 1 Work Plan
>>
>> -- Agreed to the following textual change for Task 1, subtask 1, items 1
>> and 2: "1. Develop guidelines, rules, or principles for constituency
>> participation in stakeholder groups." and "2. Develop guidelines, rules, or
>> principles for participation in constituencies.
>>
>> -- Agreed to being flexible in the implementation of the Work Plan
>> subtasks and not to be tied to semantics.
>>
>>
>>
>> 3.  Clarification on the Timing of Board Approvals of Constituency
>> Charters and Possible Conflicts with Work Team Recommendations
>>
>> -- Concerns were raised concerning possible conflicts with existing
>> constituency/stakeholder charters arising from the Work Team's
>> recommendations.
>>
>> -- Work Team members agreed to identify specific areas of concern within
>> their subtasks, aided by a table prepared by Julie Hedlund.  (See Action
>> Item 1 above.)
>>
>> -- Concerns also were raised respecting possible conflicts/duplication
>> with the ongoing Constituency Renewal Process.  Rob Hoggarth agreed to
>> provide information on the Board resolution/process.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Julie
>>
>>
>>
>> Julie Hedlund
>>
>> Policy Consultant
>>
>
>