RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Action Items: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April 2009

["Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry for not being clear Olga. 

 

I'm really saying I'd like to amend the action points if we are to be
held to them-they don't quite capture some agreed points and they are
not accurate as Minutes.   

 

I'm also asking where are our formal minutes?

 

Best regards, 

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 

 

 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication. 

 

From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Olga Cavalli
Sent: 24 April 2009 22:18
To: Victoria McEvedy
Cc: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Action Items: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April
2009

 

Dear Victoria,
I just changed you name for Veronica in my last email, my apologies!
Have a nice weekend!
Regards
Olga

2009/4/24 Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,
Dear Veronica, could you please clarfy to me your last message?
I do not understand it.
Best regards and thanks in advance
Olga

2009/4/24 Victoria McEvedy <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>

Without being pedantic is having a main points of discussion section as
we have below a usual practice? There is a danger these summaries will
stand in for Minutes without being minutes and I understand the full
recording is posted online? I think we would all like to avoid
editing/agreeing this sort of thing but I don't agree with the
scope/characterization of some of the wording-but is it important?
Apologies in advance.  

   

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 



 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication. 

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 24 April 2009 17:41
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Action Items: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April 2009
Meeting

 

Dear Work Team Members,

 

For your review and consideration, the following are suggested action
items and main points of discussion from today's meeting.  I welcome
your questions and comments.  These also are posted on the wiki at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team>
.  Also, please note that the next meeting will be held on Friday, May 8
at 1300 UTC.

 

Meeting Action Items:

1.  Draft Task 1 Work Plan:

-- Julie will review constituency and stakeholder group charters and
indicate which contain the criteria listed in subtasks 1, 2, and 3 of
the Task 1 Work Plan.

-- Work Team members will use the table to determine possible areas of
concern/conflict as recommendations are developed for each of the Task 1
subtasks.

2.  Board resolution on Constituency Renewal Process -- Rob Hoggarth
will provide information pertaining to the Board resolution on the
Constituency Renewal Process.

 

Main Points of Discussion:

1.  Staff support

-- Discussed procedures for requesting support and the need to
coordinate requests to ensure all Work Team needs are addressed.

-- Emphasized the commitment by staff to support the Work Team as
described in the Charter: "V. STAFF SUPPORT The ICANN Staff assigned to
the work team will fully support the work of the teams as directed by
the Chair including meeting support, document drafting, editing and
distribution and other substantive contributions when appropriate."

-- Staff suggested an action item, to which the team agreed, to produce
preliminary information to address subtasks 1, 2, and 3 as described
above.

 

2.  Text of Task 1 Work Plan

-- Agreed to the following textual change for Task 1, subtask 1, items 1
and 2: "1. Develop guidelines, rules, or principles for constituency
participation in stakeholder groups." and "2. Develop guidelines, rules,
or principles for participation in constituencies.

-- Agreed to being flexible in the implementation of the Work Plan
subtasks and not to be tied to semantics.

 

3.  Clarification on the Timing of Board Approvals of Constituency
Charters and Possible Conflicts with Work Team Recommendations

-- Concerns were raised concerning possible conflicts with existing
constituency/stakeholder charters arising from the Work Team's
recommendations.

-- Work Team members agreed to identify specific areas of concern within
their subtasks, aided by a table prepared by Julie Hedlund.  (See Action
Item 1 above.)

-- Concerns also were raised respecting possible conflicts/duplication
with the ongoing Constituency Renewal Process.  Rob Hoggarth agreed to
provide information on the Board resolution/process.

 

Best regards,

 

Julie

 

Julie Hedlund

Policy Consultant