RE: [gnso-osc-csg] 24 April Meeting Notes: OSC-Constituency Operations Work Team

["Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Apologies if we are going over old ground Olga. Chuck -thanks, you make a very 
good point.  

 

It maybe it's an issue of form then. I'm not so sure we have found the right 
halfway house.     

 

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 

 

 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication. 

 

From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga 
Cavalli
Sent: 28 April 2009 20:09
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Victoria McEvedy; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] 24 April Meeting Notes: OSC-Constituency Operations 
Work Team

 

Thanks Chuck,
I agree that we must check the quality of transcrips before considering them 
valid.
We agreed during our kickoff meeting in Mexico to produce meeting minutes, that 
should be reviewed by the working group and posted into our wiki.
Regards
Olga



2009/4/28 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Unless things have changed recently, the work to distribute reasonable quality 
transcripts may not justify the value.  If the transcripts produced by the 
teleconference service were of reasonable quality and immediately usable, that 
would be good.  In the past though, my understanding is that they needed 
significant editing before they were effectively usable.  We need Glen to tell 
us how much editing work is required to prepare transcripts for distribution so 
that we can determine whether the value justifies the effort.

 

I have no problem with them being posted so that we can decide for ourselves 
how much value they add, but I just suggest that we don't expect too much.  
Transcripts of audio teleconference meetings should not be assumed to be the 
same as the live transcripts produced at ICANN regional meetings.

 

Chuck

         

________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Victoria McEvedy
        Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 2:21 PM
        To: Olga Cavalli; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx

        
        Cc: OSC-CSG Work Team

        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] 24 April Meeting Notes: OSC-Constituency 
Operations Work Team

        Julie thank you.  

         

        As to general approach, to avoid paraphrasing, if we are going to have 
transcripts as well as recordings -we can in future perhaps forgo this and 
simply refer to the transcripts for minutes?

         

        I don't know what others views are. 

         

        Perhaps instead then at the end of our calls we can agree our action 
items/deliverables/decisions made -and leave people to find the reasoning in 
the transcripts? 

         

        In relation to the summary of our last two calls, I'd like to defer to 
the transcript on a couple of points so will wait until we have them available. 

         

        Thank you and best,  

         

        Victoria McEvedy

        Principal 

        McEvedys

        Solicitors and Attorneys 

        

         

        96 Westbourne Park Road 

        London 

        W2 5PL

         

        T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

        F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

        M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

         

        www.mcevedy.eu  

        Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

        This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the 
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be 
legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by 
reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, 
copying or forwarding the contents.

        This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no 
retainer is created by this email communication. 

         

        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
        Sent: 28 April 2009 18:15
        To: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx
        Cc: OSC-CSG Work Team
        Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] 24 April Meeting Notes: OSC-Constituency 
Operations Work Team

         

        Thanks Julie,
        very helpful.
        Regards
        Olga

        2009/4/27 Julie Hedlund <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>

        Dear Work Team Members,

         

        The draft notes summarizing our discussion at our 24 April 2009 meeting 
are posted at 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?osc_constituency_operation_work_team_meeting_notes
 and are linked from the main wiki page at 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.  I 
welcome your comments and suggested changes.  

         

        Also, Glen de Saint Géry, the GNSO Secretariat, has informed me that 
she will be posting transcripts of all Work Team meetings on the GNSO Calendar 
site at: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#april.  As those for our team become 
available, I will link to them from our meeting notes.

         

        In addition, the MP3 recordings for each meeting are linked to the 
meeting notes.  If you scroll down the notes page you will see, listed in 
succession, the meeting notes for all of the meetings to date along with their 
MP3 recordings.

         

        Best regards,

         

        Julie

         

        Julie Hedlund

        Policy Consultant