RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-Constituency Operations Work Team: Request for Information

["Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Robert, conscious of our concern as to timing and of the Board Meeting
scheduled for this week, would you be able to give us an update on
timings and developments since the April 23 Special meeting: 

"1. GNSO Improvements 

a. Implementation Efforts and Council Restructuring 

Staff provided an update to the Board on the status of the GNSO
Improvements Implementation Efforts and the work remaining prior to the
June 2009 implementation timeline approved by the Board. Staff and Board
addressed specific issues relating to the outstanding petitions and
charters of new Stakeholder Groups and potential amendment of those
documents, as well as petitions and charters for new Constituency groups
and the anticipated receipt of further petitions. Staff was directed to
continue work towards implementation, and no Board action was taken." 

 

Thank you and best regards, 

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 

 

 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication. 

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: 16 May 2009 20:47
To: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-Constituency Operations Work Team: Task
1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Feedback Request

 

Dear Julie,
thanks for the draft document.
I would make one suggestion and one comment.

Suggestion:
why dont we include first in the text the two questions that we are
asking and then we show the table?
I think this will give more relevance to the main purpose of the
document.

Comment:
responding to Robbert suggestion about defining style for "tool kit", it
is important and I would welcome those English native speakers in the
team to help with this issue.

Best regards
Olga



2009/5/15 Julie Hedlund <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Dear Work Team Members,

 

Attached for your review and consideration is a Draft Tool Kit Feedback
Request document for Task 1, Subtask 4: Develop a "toolkit" of in-kind
staff support and/or services for all constituencies (Subtask Lead:
Julie Hedlund, Participants: Chuck Gomes)  

 

The document also is linked to the Subtask 4 Work Plan at 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?osc_constituency_operations_wor
k_team_task_1_work_plan
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?osc_constituency_operations_wo
rk_team_task_1_work_plan> .

 

We welcome your comments, questions, and suggestions.  Thank you.

 

Best regards,

 

Julie

 

Julie Hedlund

Policy Consultant