Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-Constituency Operations Work Team: Request for Information

[Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Victoria;

Thanks for your message.

Since the 23 April Board meeting, the most significant developments have been 
...


 1.  Submission of a revised SG Charter from the Registries Constituency and 
the posting of that document for Public Comment - see 
http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ryc-sg-petition
 2.  Appointment of Board Member Raimundo Beca to serve as Board - GNSO Liaison 
on GNSO Improvements matters.
 3.  Significant GNSO Council Restructuring Team discussions on Bylaw 
amendments addressing GNSO Improvements effort - see 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-restruc-dt/.  If you have a chance to review 
the archives you'll see the discussion has been quite substantial.  There have 
also been two recorded conference calls (5 May and 12 May) that you may wish to 
listen to that can be accessed here - http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#may
 4.  The Agenda for the ICANN Board meeting this week reflects additional GNSO 
Improvements related discussion on Stakeholder Group Charters. - see 
http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/agenda-21may09.htm.  Not sure about how quickly 
the Board will report on the actions at their meeting.  Depending on that, we 
may have further updates to discuss on Friday.
 5.  This last item is more speculation, but since the Bylaws Amendments are 
not yet finalized - let alone agreed to by the GNSO community, there is wide 
spread expectation in the community that the June timetable for reseating the 
Council will be extended by the Board.

Have been collaborating with Julie this afternoon on gathering information to 
answer your other inquiries and that will be forthcoming soon.

Cheers,

Rob Hoggarth


On 5/18/09 10:01 AM, "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Robert, conscious of our concern as to timing and of the Board Meeting 
scheduled for this week, would you be able to give us an update on timings and 
developments since the April 23 Special meeting:
"1. GNSO Improvements
a. Implementation Efforts and Council Restructuring
Staff provided an update to the Board on the status of the GNSO Improvements 
Implementation Efforts and the work remaining prior to the June 2009 
implementation timeline approved by the Board. Staff and Board addressed 
specific issues relating to the outstanding petitions and charters of new 
Stakeholder Groups and potential amendment of those documents, as well as 
petitions and charters for new Constituency groups and the anticipated receipt 
of further petitions. Staff was directed to continue work towards 
implementation, and no Board action was taken."

Thank you and best regards,

Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
[cid:3325601979_36979418]

96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169

www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication.


From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: 16 May 2009 20:47
To: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-Constituency Operations Work Team: Task 1, 
Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Feedback Request

Dear Julie,
thanks for the draft document.
I would make one suggestion and one comment.

Suggestion:
why dont we include first in the text the two questions that we are asking and 
then we show the table?
I think this will give more relevance to the main purpose of the document.

Comment:
responding to Robbert suggestion about defining style for "tool kit", it is 
important and I would welcome those English native speakers in the team to help 
with this issue.

Best regards
Olga

2009/5/15 Julie Hedlund <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Dear Work Team Members,



Attached for your review and consideration is a Draft Tool Kit Feedback Request 
document for Task 1, Subtask 4: Develop a "toolkit" of in-kind staff support 
and/or services for all constituencies (Subtask Lead: Julie Hedlund, 
Participants: Chuck Gomes)



The document also is linked to the Subtask 4 Work Plan at 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?osc_constituency_operations_work_team_task_1_work_plan
 
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?osc_constituency_operations_work_team_task_1_work_plan>
 .



We welcome your comments, questions, and suggestions.  Thank you.



Best regards,



Julie



Julie Hedlund

Policy Consultant