Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Subtask 1-Draft 3-on Claudio's Comments

["Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>]

I would second Claudio's comment and suggestion.  Membership criteria 
throughout the various Constituencies would differ and so cannot be uniform.  
Speaking as a member of the BC I can say this is true in our constituency. 






Sincerely,

Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com
 
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being 
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may 
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and 
constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The 
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever 
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by 
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use 
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & 
Jamil is prohibited.


Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

-----Original Message-----
From: Claudio Di Gangi <cdigangi@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:24:28 
To: 'SS Kshatriy'<sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>; OSC-CSG Work 
Team<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Subtask 1-Draft 3-on Claudio's Comments

Dear SS,

I am resending my comments on Subtask 1, and to avoid confusion I have inserted 
them into the Draft3 version. Thanks for your ongoing efforts on this work.

In regards to your question below, the current draft states:

‘All Groups must offer membership to natural persons or individuals as well as 
to entities with legal personality such as corporations. However, anybody 
applying for membership shall meet the membership criteria laid down by 
individual Group with ICANN’s approval.

The reason I commented on this item is because it begins by requiring all 
Groups to offer uniform membership, but then infers that Groups may elect to 
develop their own criteria. I think phrasing it this way would confuse some, 
but more importantly, it does not reflect the true diversity of interests 
within the GNSO (as it implies that uniform membership is preferable or should 
be the default).

My suggestion is the following:

“Groups should determine their membership criteria as they best deem 
appropriate, based on the communities they represent. Groups should consider 
offering membership to natural persons or individuals, as well as to entities 
with legal personality such as corporations. However, anybody applying for 
membership shall meet the membership criteria laid down by the Group with 
ICANN’s approval.”



From: SS Kshatriy [mailto:sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:34 AM
To: OSC-CSG Work Team; Claudio Di Gangi
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Subtask 1-Draft 3-on Claudio's Comments

Dear Claudio,
1. I have seen your comments circulated earlier. Those are the comments on 
Victoria's comments.
Not many of Victoria's comments are accommodated in Draft 3.
It will be difficult to co-relate and understand comments from different 
documents and I may make mistakes.
Hence, I will request you to give your comments on Draft 3 wherever you want to.

2. Section 2 changes are re-produced below:
            In Section 2, item be says, "All Groups must offer membership to 
natural persons or ..          ..          ..
SS        Chuck Gomes concern accommodated.
‘All Groups must offer membership to natural persons or individuals as well as 
to entities with legal personality such as corporations.’ Is revised as:
 ‘All Groups must offer membership to natural persons or individuals as well as 
to entities with legal personality such as corporations. However, anybody 
applying for membership shall meet the membership criteria laid down by 
individual Group with ICANN’s approval.
--
I am not able to understand; where is conflict?
Pl be a little more specific.
best,
SS
--


--- On Sat, 10/3/09, Claudio Di Gangi <cdigangi@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Claudio Di Gangi <cdigangi@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Subtask 1-Draft 3-ss
To: "SS Kshatriy" <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>, "OSC-CSG Work Team" 
<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, October 3, 2009, 6:15 AM

SS,

I circulated comments on Subtask1 yesterday. Am I correct you received those, 
and will incorporate them into the next draft?

Also, the change made on item 2 appears to contain conflicting recommendations. 
can you clarify what your intention is on that item?

thanks

Claudio
________________________________________
From: 
owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc572.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
 
[owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc572.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>]
 On Behalf Of SS Kshatriy 
[sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc572.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 2:02 AM
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Subtask 1-Draft 3-ss

Dear WT Members,
Attached is:
1. Cover Note on Subtask1-Draft 3 and,
2. Subtask1-Draft 3.
--
It is important to read Subtask1-Draft 3 along with Cover Note Subtask1-Draft 3.
Please send your feedback/comments by Thursday, October 08, 2009.
--
Please see that your feedback/comments are backed by reasoning and contribute 
to 'GNSO Improvements'.

best regards,
SS