ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC CSG-WT - Proposed agenda for the teleconference Friday 9 October-ss

  • To: OSC-CSG Work Team <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC CSG-WT - Proposed agenda for the teleconference Friday 9 October-ss
  • From: SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 05:01:00 -0700 (PDT)

Dear Olga,
Subject-Agenda
--
I am not in favor of including item 2--discussion on Subtask 4.
It has become a controversial subject.
Once minority reports are submitted OSC and Council will spend their time and 
effort to debate and take decision.
Is it proper for WT to proceed with discussions on such a matter?
 
I suggest that we defer this issue for the time being.
--
In the meantime, 
1. Please find if there are some rules to guide in a situation when minority 
reports are submitted on a subject?
2. If there are no rules, there should be some authoritative source to consult.
 
best regards,
SS
 

--- On Wed, 10/7/09, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC CSG Working Team - Proposed agenda for the 
teleconference Friday 9 October 13 UTC
To: "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "Robert Hoggarth" 
<robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>, "Glen de Saint Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gisella 
Gruber-White" <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>, "Olga Cavalli" 
<olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009, 1:07 PM




Dear Working Team,



After reviewing all the comments exchanged in the email list, this is the 
proposed agenda for our next conference call.

Please feel free to send comments or suggested changes.

Looking forward to talking to you next Friday.

Best regards

Olga



Draft Agenda - OSC-CSG Working Team conference call - Friday 9 October 13 UTC


1- ICANN Board and other policy updates - ICANN Staff

2- Exchange of comments about rough consensus for sending 1.4 toolkit document, 
as an independent document, to the OSC and to the GNSO Council. 
Due dates for recieveing minority reports.
Ideas for document´s format.

3- Status of Subtask documents
Subtasks 1.1 and 1.2:
Several comments were recieved from subtask participants and were incorporated 
by Subtask leaders SS and Victoria.
Due dates for recieveing Working team comments.
Subtask 1.3:
No comments were recieved from the Working Team. 

4- Next steps

5- AOB





      


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy