Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC CSG-WT - Proposed agenda for the teleconference Friday 9 October-ss

["Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>]

This is becoming overly cumbersome and I fear what impact such stances may have 
on the effectiveness of this group. 






Sincerely,

Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com
 
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being 
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may 
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and 
constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The 
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever 
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by 
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use 
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & 
Jamil is prohibited.


Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

-----Original Message-----
From: SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 05:01:00 
To: OSC-CSG Work Team<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>; Olga 
Cavalli<olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Julie Hedlund<julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>; Robert 
Hoggarth<robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>; Glen de Saint Géry<Glen@xxxxxxxxx>; 
Gisella Gruber-White<Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>; Olga 
Cavalli<olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC CSG-WT - Proposed agenda for the teleconference 
Friday  9 October-ss 

Dear Olga,
Subject-Agenda
--
I am not in favor of including item 2--discussion on Subtask 4.
It has become a controversial subject.
Once minority reports are submitted OSC and Council will spend their time and 
effort to debate and take decision.
Is it proper for WT to proceed with discussions on such a matter?
 
I suggest that we defer this issue for the time being.
--
In the meantime, 
1. Please find if there are some rules to guide in a situation when minority 
reports are submitted on a subject?
2. If there are no rules, there should be some authoritative source to consult.
 
best regards,
SS
 

--- On Wed, 10/7/09, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC CSG Working Team - Proposed agenda for the 
teleconference Friday 9 October 13 UTC
To: "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "Robert Hoggarth" 
<robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>, "Glen de Saint Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gisella 
Gruber-White" <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>, "Olga Cavalli" 
<olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009, 1:07 PM




Dear Working Team,



After reviewing all the comments exchanged in the email list, this is the 
proposed agenda for our next conference call.

Please feel free to send comments or suggested changes.

Looking forward to talking to you next Friday.

Best regards

Olga



Draft Agenda - OSC-CSG Working Team conference call - Friday 9 October 13 UTC


1- ICANN Board and other policy updates - ICANN Staff

2- Exchange of comments about rough consensus for sending 1.4 toolkit document, 
as an independent document, to the OSC and to the GNSO Council. 
Due dates for recieveing minority reports.
Ideas for document´s format.

3- Status of Subtask documents
Subtasks 1.1 and 1.2:
Several comments were recieved from subtask participants and were incorporated 
by Subtask leaders SS and Victoria.
Due dates for recieveing Working team comments.
Subtask 1.3:
No comments were recieved from the Working Team. 

4- Next steps

5- AOB