RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Uniformity

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

How do you know he didn't do his homework?

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Victoria McEvedy
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 7:54 PM
> To: Claudio Di Gangi; zahid@xxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry; 
> owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-csg
> Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Uniformity
> 
> 
> 
> There is no question of any violation or wrong doing. Just 
> homework.   
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claudio Di Gangi [mailto:cdigangi@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 10 October 2009 00:28
> To: Victoria McEvedy; zahid@xxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry; 
> owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-csg
> Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Uniformity
> 
> Victoria,
> 
> Thanks for this. I have the following observations:
> 
> the text you quote, highlights the following points:
> 
> 1. GNSO improvements recommendations should apply equally 
> across all groups in the GNSO 2. the operating procedures 
> should reflect common agreed upon principles
> 
> I see nothing in the text that suggests that the BGC was 
> suggesting that all GNSO Groups follow all the same 
> organizational rules, operating procedures and 
> representational structures.
> 
> Also, I disagree that Zahid violated any rules or did 
> anything wrong by raising this question.
> 
> Have a nice weekend.
> 
> Claudio
> 
> 
> From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Victoria McEvedy 
> [victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 6:45 PM
> To: Victoria McEvedy; zahid@xxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry; 
> owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-csg
> Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Uniformity
> 
> Apologies for the short response earlier. Zahid I refer you 
> to the BGC Report:
> 
> The BGC Report at p.43 mandated the development of the following:
> 
>  1.  "...constituency-developed participation rules for all 
> constituencies that encourage openness, transparency and 
> accountability. The rules must adhere to the following  principles.."
>  2.  "..clear operating principles for each constituency to 
> ensure that all constituencies function in a representative, 
> open, transparent and democratic manner. Operating procedures 
> adopted by constituencies should reflect common principles 
> and follow these guidelines:"[1] The BGC summarized this in 
> the following action item at p.46: "Proposed Action Item: The 
> Board requests: (i) The GNSO constituencies, with assistance 
> from Staff as needed, to develop a set of participation rules 
> and operating procedures, consistent with the principles 
> outlined above, which all constituencies should abide by. The 
> ICANN Board should ask the constituencies to develop and 
> publicize common principles within six months; and to 
> implement operating rules and procedures consistent with 
> those principles at that time."
> 
> Zahid, this WG spent some 6 months on these issues and I'm 
> afraid I do believe there are rules about re-opening old 
> ground. We spent months on literal approaches to the BGC.
> 
> Zahid ---I suggest you read all the old minutes and transcript.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Victoria McEvedy
> Principal
> McEvedys
> Solicitors and Attorneys
> [cid:image001.jpg@01CA4939.E81C4210]
> 
> 96 Westbourne Park Road
> London
> W2 5PL
> 
> T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
> F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
> M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169
> 
> www.mcevedy.eu
> Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972 This 
> email and its attachments are confidential and intended for 
> the exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its 
> attachments may also be legally privileged. If you have 
> received this in error, please let us know by reply 
> immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without 
> reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
> This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship 
> and no retainer is created by this email communication.
> 
> From: Victoria McEvedy
> Sent: 09 October 2009 21:02
> To: zahid@xxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry; 
> owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-csg
> Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Uniformity
> 
> AKA common rules
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
> 
> ________________________________
> From: "Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:47:01 +0100
> To: Glen de Saint Géry<Glen@xxxxxxxxx>; 
> <owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>; gnso-osc-csg<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Uniformity
> 
> Just listening to the audio of the call I missed. Could 
> someone point out to me where the board used the word 
> uniformity in the boards approval of the improvements. Having 
> difficulty to find it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Zahid Jamil
> Barrister-at-law
> Jamil & Jamil
> Barristers-at-law
> 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
> Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
> Cell: +923008238230
> Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
> Fax: +92 21 5655026
> www.jamilandjamil.com
> 
> Notice / Disclaimer
> This message contains confidential information and its 
> contents are being communicated only for the intended 
> recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should 
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
> Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have 
> received this message by mistake and delete it from your 
> system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual 
> property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute 
> privileged information protected by attorney client 
> privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, 
> modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts 
> (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by 
> electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally 
> or some other use of this communication) without prior 
> written permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
> 
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 09:57:45 -0700
> To: gnso-osc-csg<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] MP3 Constituency Operations work team 
> call / Friday 9 October at 13:00 UTC.
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Please find the MP3 recording of the Constituency Operations 
> work team call held on Friday 9 October at 13:00 UTC.
> 
> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-constituency-ops-20091009.mp3
> 
> On page:
> http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/index.html#oct
> 
> Participants present:
> Michael Young - Registries - vice chair
> Rafik Dammak - NCUC
> Chuck Gomes - Registries
> Victoria McEvedy - IPC
> Claudio Digangi - IPC
> Tony Harris - ISP
> SS Kshatriya - Individual
> 
> ICANN Staff
> Glen de Saint Géry - GNSO Secretariat
> Julie Hedlund - Policy Staff
> 
> Apologies
> Olga Cavalli - work team chair - NCA
> Krista Papac - Registrar c.
> Zahid Jamil - CBUC
> 
> Thank you
> Kind regards
> Glen
> ----------------------------
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of 
> virus signature database 4494 (20091009)__________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of 
> virus signature database 4494 (20091009) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> ________________________________
> [1] The BGC summarized this in the following action item at 
> p.46: "Proposed Action Item: The Board requests: (i) The GNSO 
> constituencies, with assistance from Staff as needed, to 
> develop a set of participation rules and operating 
> procedures, consistent with the principles outlined above, 
> which all constituencies should abide by. The ICANN Board 
> should ask the constituencies to develop and publicize common 
> principles within six months; and to implement operating 
> rules and procedures consistent with those principles at that time."
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of 
> virus signature database 4494 (20091009) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
>  
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of 
> virus signature database 4494 (20091009) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
>  
>  
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of 
> virus signature database 4494 (20091009) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
>  
> 
>