RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This looks interesting Rafik.  Thanks.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 12:42 AM
        To: Gomes, Chuck
        Cc: Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
        Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010
Meeting
        
        
        Hi Chuck,
        
        for editing, maybe we should think to use tool like
http://etherpad.com/ which allow realtime collaboration and highlighting
edits
        
        Regards
        
        Rafik
        
        
        2010/3/30 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        

                I don't understand why there appear to be edits made in
quotations from the BGC report (e.g., Section 1.1)
                 
                After finalizing this document in terms of content, I
suggest that a clean MS Word version be created and that a new redline
version be created with minor, non-substantial edits be done because the
wording is very poor in lots of cases, probably because of the many
edits.  I did not comment on these kinds of edits below.
                 
                In II.1.c, I think "A member who has served two
consecutive terms on the Executive Committee must remain out of office
for one full term prior to serving any subsequent term as a member of
the Executive Committee." should be changed to "A member who has served
four consecutive years on the Executive Committee must remain out of
office for one full term prior to serving any subsequent term as a
member of the Executive Committee."  I think the same change applies to
II.4.
                 
                II.3.a (formerly b) has what appears to be an incomplete
sentence: "should be open and publicly archived --with posting rights
limited to members at the election of the".
                 
                II.9 needs some serious editing.
                 
                II.11 - Not sure a handbook is worth the effort if the
recommendations are concisely and clearly written.
                 
                II.12 - What is the purpose of this: "We recommend that
all recommendations above, apply also to the Contracted House
Stakeholder Groups." ?  I thought the plan was to refer to
Constituencies and SGs in all cases.
                 
                Who is the "we" in Part IV?  What is the purpose of this
section?  Why are the subsections numbered 3.x?
                 
                This document is way too long.
                 
                Using a wiki is terribly ineffecience for such a long
document.
                 
                Chuck
                 
                 


________________________________

                        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
                        Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 3:48 PM
                        To: gnso-osc-csg
                        Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26
March 2010 Meeting
                        
                        
                        Dear Work Team members,
                        
                        Here are the actions/summary from today's
meeting and posted on the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team..
Please let me know if you have any changes or questions.  Our next
meeting will be held Friday, 09 April at 1300 UTC/0600 PST/0900 EST for
one hour.   Thank you very much.
                        
                        Best regards,
                        
                        Julie
                        
                        Action Items:
                        1. Task 1, Subtask 2: (See the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_g
roup_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2. )
                        A) CHANGES THROUGH SECTION 8:
                        

                        *       Work Team members should review all
changes through Section 8. Policy and provide comments to the list not
later than Friday, 01 April. It will be assumed that all changes are
agreed to if no comments are received. 
                        *       Rafik Dammak agreed to ask Mary Wong if
she had suggestions for alternative language for Section 8. Policy,
paragraph b. "Committee meetings should be open for attendance by all
{GROUP} members -- and at the election of the Constituency -- to the
public." 
                        *       Krista Papac agreed to review Claudio
DiGangi's suggested language (added to the wiki) to Section 4. Voting as
it also could be applied to Section 1. Executive Committees to maintain
consistency.
                                

                        B) REMAINING SECTIONS: Work Team members should
review the remaining sections of Task 1, Subtask 2 and send comments to
the list: 
                        

                        *       9. GNSO WG; 
                        *       10. Reference to Code of Practice at
Annex B (and Annex B text); 
                        *       11. Reference to Handbook on Common
Rules and Principles;   
                        *       12. Reference to recommendations
applying to Contracted House Stakeholder Groups; and 
                        *       Part IV: Analysis
                                

                        
                        2. Task 1, Subtask 3: Julie will load the latest
version from Krista on the wiki. Work Team members are requested to
review the document in preparation for the meeting on Friday, 09 April.
                        
                        3. Task 2: Outreach: Debbie Hughes will provide
some ideas to begin the discussion on the Sub Team. The Sub Team members
are: Debbie (leader), Olga Cavalli, Rafik Dammak, Claudio DiGangi, Chuck
Gomes, and Michael Young.
                        
                        Summary:
                        

                        *       Olga noted that Philip Sheppard, the new
Chair of the Operations Steering Committee, has requested that the Work
Team complete its work by 01 June in preparation for the ICANN meeting
in Brussels. Olga explained to Philip that the Work Team might not be
able to complete Task 2, but would complete the remaining subtasks of
Task 1. She recommended that the Work Team should finish Task 1, Subtask
2 by the next meeting and begin a review of Task 1, Subtask 3, and asked
Krista to send the latest version for Julie to load on the wiki. 
                        *       The Work Team discussed additional
changes to Section 1. Elections and Section 4. Voting. Claudio provided
revised language to the list for consideration. Krista agreed to review
Section 1. Elections in view of Claudio's revised language. 
                        *       The Work Team agreed to retain the
previous changes in Section 5. Voting. Rafik agreed to ask Mary Wong if
she had suggestions for alternative language for Section 8. Policy,
paragraph b. "Committee meetings should be open for attendance by all
Constituency {GROUP} members -- and at the election of the Constituency
-- to the public." 
                        *       On Task 2, Olga asked for volunteers for
a Task Sub Team. Debbie Hughes agreed to be the leader of the Sub Team
and the other volunteers were: Olga Cavalli, Rafik Dammak, Claudio
DiGangi, Chuck Gomes, and Michael Young. 
                        *