ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting

  • To: "'Rafik Dammak'" <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting
  • From: Claudio Di Gangi <cdigangi@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 08:59:35 -0400

Rafik,

The term limit would not be meaningless as it would apply to all constituency 
and stakeholder group elected officers.

It would not apply to the executive or policy committees which is a different 
issue.

claudio

From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 3:36 AM
To: Claudio Di Gangi
Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting

Hi Claudio,
I am confused about your suggestion as the limit will be meaningless if it is 
not applied to executive committee.
if there is fears about volunteering, that issue is more linked to 
representativeness level of Group.
 "but I would not extend the term limit to policy and executive committees. 
This is consistent with the BGC recommendation which we are tasked with 
implementing, which states: “"There should be term limits for constituency 
officers, so as to help attract new members and provide everyone with the 
chance to participate in leadership positions."
 and after the effort done for II.8 I am not in favor of deletion.
Regards

Rafik


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy