RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 09 April 2010 Meeting

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That worked Julie.  Thanks.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 6:14 PM
        To: Gomes, Chuck
        Cc: gnso-osc-csg
        Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 09 April 2010
Meeting
        
        
        Chuck,
        
        When I look back at my message the file appears to have been
renamed with a # sign after I sent it.  I can't imagine why that
happened.  I am attaching the file that I saved again using the correct
name.  Let's see if that works.
        
        Thanks,
        Julie
        
        
        On 4/9/10 6:04 PM, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
        
        

                Thanks Julie.  I can open the subtask 1.3 file but not
the 1.2 file, at least not in readable form.
                
                Chuck
                
                

                        
                         
                        
________________________________

                        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie  Hedlund
                        Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 5:19 PM
                        To:  gnso-osc-csg
                        Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 09
April 2010  Meeting
                        
                         
                        Dear Work Team members,
                        
                        Here are the  actions/summary from today's
meeting.  Please let me know if you have any  changes or questions.  Our
next meeting will be held next Friday, 16  April at 1300 UTC/0600
PST/0900 EST for one hour.  The actions  and summary are included on the
wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
Please note that because the meeting times are very early for  those
Work Team members on the West Coast it was suggested that we may wish to
select a time later in the day on Friday's.  However, some Work Team
members and staff may have conflicts.  Please let me know ASAP if  you
would prefer to move the call to a particular time and I will check to
see  whether there are staff or other conflicts.  Thank  you.
                        
                        Best regards,
                        
                        Julie
                        
                        Summary/Action Items:
                        1.  Deadlines: Olga noted that the deadline for
submitting the WT's  recommendations for Task 1, Subtasks 1-3 to the OSC
is 01 June. She asked  Julie to compile the Subtask recommendations into
one document once they all  are approved.
                        
                        2. Task 1, Subtask 2: The WT members discussed
language for term limits and agreed to an option suggested by Chuck and
modified by Tony that would apply term limits to GROUP Councilors and
Officers, and to Stakeholder Group Executive Committee members.  Olga
asked Julie to draft language for a new section on Term Limits for the
WT to  review. With respect to Part II, Section 8 Policy, Olga asked
Julie to include  the language suggested by Mary Wong for the WT to
review.  On Annex B,  Tony suggested deleting the section and the WT
members on the call agreed,  noting that there was agreement among WT
members at the meeting in Seoul,  South Korea also to delete Annex B.
Olga asked Julie to produce a Word  document of Task 1, Subtask 2
including the changes agreed to thus far and  indicating additions and
deletions using tracked changes. ACTION: WT  members should review the
attached document and recommend any further changes.   In particular, WT
members should note the following 1) new Part II,  Section 1 Term
Limits; 2) Mary Wong's proposed language for Section 9c  (previously 8c)
Policy, and 3) Section 10 GNSO Working Group through to the  end of the
document.
                        
                        3. Task 1, Subtask 3: Olga  noted that no WT
members had suggested changes to Subtask 3. Julie suggested  resending
the document to the WT to confirm that there are no changes and that
the text is approved. ACTION: Work Team members should review the
attached document and either recommend any further changes or indicate
that  they agree to the text.
                        
                        4. Task 2: ACTION:  Debra Hughes is preparing
preliminary thoughts.