RE: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP)

[Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ray PLEASE  send the changed powerpoint as soon as possible !
Glen

From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Ray Fassett
Sent: mardi 27 octobre 2009 08:23
To: 'Ron Andruff'; KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; 
gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Gisella Gruber-White
Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP)

I take it this is replacing the previous motion to the change the language?  
i.e. is not an additional motion...please confirm.

I can support this at the will of the Council.

I would set 11/18 or 11/25 if this is acceptable.  This is gives us two or 
three WT discussions to arrive at a sound proposal.  Open to suggestion.

Glen:  Looks like the power point is changing again :)

________________________________
From: Ron Andruff [mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:16 AM
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; ray@xxxxxxxxx; ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; 
gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP)

I support this revised motion.

RA


Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor

New York, New York 10001



www.rnapartners.com<http://www.rnapartners.com>

V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11

F:  +1 212 481 2859

________________________________
From: owner-ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 2009-10-27 03:04
To: ray@xxxxxxxxx; ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP)

Ray:

from the discussion within the CSG it turned out that there are still questions 
open with regard how abstentions should be counted in the voting process. The 
council (through the working team) is requested to review this point and come 
back with a revised proposal after a fixed short period of time. The related 
current draft motion would be approved with keeping the existing text as status 
quo until the revised text is been accepted.

My intention for tomorrows council meeting is to come up with the revised 
motion as attached.

Please feed back
- whether this is acceptable
- with setting a date where this point could e resolved

Thanks
Wolf-Ulrich