RE: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP)
Glen, please find attached. This is sort of a moving target. So it is either going to be the attached version dated the 27th or the previous version dated the 26th. I am guessing it is going to be the one attached. _____ From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:43 AM To: Ray Fassett; 'Ron Andruff'; KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx Cc: Gisella Gruber-White Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP) Ray PLEASE send the changed powerpoint as soon as possible ! Glen From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ray Fassett Sent: mardi 27 octobre 2009 08:23 To: 'Ron Andruff'; KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx Cc: Gisella Gruber-White Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP) I take it this is replacing the previous motion to the change the language? i.e. is not an additional motion?please confirm. I can support this at the will of the Council. I would set 11/18 or 11/25 if this is acceptable. This is gives us two or three WT discussions to arrive at a sound proposal. Open to suggestion. Glen: Looks like the power point is changing again :-) _____ From: Ron Andruff [mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:16 AM To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; ray@xxxxxxxxx; ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx Cc: Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP) I support this revised motion. RA Ronald N. Andruff RNA Partners, Inc. 220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor New York, New York 10001 www.rnapartners.com V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11 F: +1 212 481 2859 _____ From: owner-ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: 2009-10-27 03:04 To: ray@xxxxxxxxx; ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx Cc: Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP) Ray: from the discussion within the CSG it turned out that there are still questions open with regard how abstentions should be counted in the voting process. The council (through the working team) is requested to review this point and come back with a revised proposal after a fixed short period of time. The related current draft motion would be approved with keeping the existing text as status quo until the revised text is been accepted. My intention for tomorrows council meeting is to come up with the revised motion as attached. Please feed back - whether this is acceptable - with setting a date where this point could e resolved Thanks Wolf-Ulrich Attachment:
ICANN_Seoul_GCOT_27Oct09.ppt
|