Re: AW: [gnso-osc-ops] In-Person Meeting - Nairobi

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

i expect to be there (still looking for funding but am being confident)  and am 
fine either way as long as it doesn't end up conflicting with the PPSC mtg as 
it appeared it might on one of the schedules or proposed schedules.

a.

On 3 Feb 2010, at 13:44, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm a little confused since according to our last meeting minutes we 
> determined already not to hold an F2F meeting. This I've already communicated 
> to Stéphane van Gelder being in charge for GNSO meeting schedules.
> Anyway I'm open to participate. We may need still discussion on abstention if 
> our own schedule fails. In addition board member election is an important 
> item.
> 
> Kind regards
> Wolf-Ulrich  
> 
> 
> Von: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] Im 
> Auftrag von Ray Fassett
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2010 17:40
> An: 'gnso-osc-ops'
> Cc: 'Ken Bour'; 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Gisella Gruber-White'; Glen@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [gnso-osc-ops] In-Person Meeting - Nairobi
> 
> All:  I am seeking formal consultation from Work Team members on the 
> necessity of calling an in-person meeting of the GCOT as part of the upcoming 
> ICANN meeting in Nairobi.  I am raising the question as a result of 
> scheduling conflicts to other meetings that will likely limit attendance to a 
> meeting we may schedule for the GCOT.  If we decide a meeting is not 
> necessary, such communication from the GCOT as early as possible to those 
> responsible for preparing meeting schedules, room reservations, and other 
> supplementary information would likely be very appreciated, with the same 
> being true vice versa.
> 
> Please let me know your thoughts by group response to our list.
> 
> Ray