<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-osc] New Clean and Redline Draft OSC Charters Documents
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] New Clean and Redline Draft OSC Charters Documents
- From: "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:04:50 -0200
Chuck,
I agree with the attached version.
Best regards
Olga
2008/12/10 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Thank you very much Rob. Attached is a copy of the clean version with
> some additional highlighted edits I suggest. I believe that the edits are
> nonmaterial but if anyone thinks otherwise and/or disagrees with them,
> please speak up.
>
> For everyone except for Philip, who already approved Rob's version, please
> use the attached version for approval purposes. Philip, if you disagree
> with any of the edits, please let us know.
>
> Remember that our goal is to approve this ASAP on the list so it would be
> very much appreciated if all primary OSC reps would respond by tomorrow if
> possible.
>
> Thanks, Chuck
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Robert Hoggarth
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 4:19 PM
> *To:* gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-osc] New Clean and Redline Draft OSC Charters Documents
>
> Dear OSC Members;
>
> Pursuant to the discussions on today's call and for your review and further
> discussion, attached please find the latest red-line and clean versions of
> the Draft OSC Charter. As instructed, in the "Redline" version I retained
> the old red-line edits (included blue color text added by Robin G.) and made
> additional changes to reflect the discussions on the call. Chuck asked me
> to take a shot at language in the bullet #2 at the beginning of the
> document. I added three words and a footnote to that section. Otherwise
> most of the other new changes are non-substantive formatting modifications
> that Chuck noted on the call. I recommend that anyone with additional
> edits add them to the clean version and circulated as appropriate.
>
> In reviewing the two documents before appending to this message, it appears
> that the only remaining substantive discussion regarding the Charter may be
> the Goals and Milestones section on the last page of the document which
> currently reads "To be determined by the OSC and approved by the Council."
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rob Hoggarth
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|