AW: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions

["Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck,
 
then lets discuss this:
 
1) select WT members + chair
2) appoint the chair as "other participant to the OSC"
 

See you on Monday


Best regards
Wolf




 

________________________________

Von: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Dezember 2008 15:41
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft Charter -
Clean and Redline Versions


Wolf,
 
I totally agree with your intention but let me share my thinking on
this:
 
1) Chairing one of the work teams is going to be a big responsibility
that will last many months; 
 
2) Several of the OSC members are already very busy in the GNSO aside
from their regular jobs; 
 
3) The OSC is a relatively small team so finding 3 different members who
have the skills and are willing and available to take on the
responsibility of chairing a work team seems like a long shot to me.; 
 
4) If we establish this as a requirement and then cannot find 3 people,
then we have to modify the requirement; 
 
5) In my opinion a better approach is to not have the requirement in the
first place;  
 
6) If we don't have the requirement but most on the OSC like the idea of
having an OSC member as chair, then we could still try to do it. 
 
7) We could actually explore whether we have three qualified volunteers
in the OSC before we make a decision on this suggested requirement. 
 
Let's talk about this with the full team on Monday along with any other
issues of the charter. 
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 9:20 AM
        To: Gomes, Chuck; robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: AW: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft
Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
        
        
        My intention was to ensure the closest cooperation between Work
Teams and SCs as possible in order to avoid unnessessary rediscussion on
two levels.
        This could also be achieved if you add to the SC-charters (here:
OSC) under "Other Participants in the OSC":

        *       
                Chair person of each Work Team

         
        Best regards
        Wolf
        
        
        
________________________________

        Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx]
Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
        Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Dezember 2008 23:10
        An: Robert Hoggarth; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
        Betreff: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team Draft
Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
        
        
        I must have missed that.
         
        Chuck


________________________________

                From: Robert Hoggarth [mailto:robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx]

                Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 4:08 PM
                To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
                Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team
Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
                
                

                Thanks, Chuck. I'll double check that.
                Wolf added the chair comment as an edit/comment on the
wiki back during the Summer for all three work teams.
                RobH

                
________________________________

                From: Gomes, Chuck 
                To: Robert Hoggarth; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx 
                Sent: Fri Dec 12 12:39:08 2008
                Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work Team
Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions 
                

                

                Thanks Rob.  The redline version appears to end in the
middle of the first sentence of Section IV.
                 
                At the end of Section IV, item 7 says, "The chair of the
team should be someone from the associated steering committing."  Where
did this come from?  I have not particular objection to someone from the
OSC being chair, but I see no reason to have that restriction.
                 
                Under Decision Making, I am not sure "full consensus of
the members" process" will work for work teams, but I am comfortable
with the work teams making a recommendation in that regard.  I suggesst
we leave Rob's comment in the draft as guidance for the work team.
                 
                In Section VII, it might be good to add potential team
projects for each of the other goals listed in Section II, even if we
only list the name of the project with no detail.
                 
                Finally, I suggest we add a section called something
like "Work Team Rules" and include the rules we have been using for WGs
to the extent that they fit.
                 
                We can discuss the above in our meeting Monday.
                 
                Chuck


________________________________

                        From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert Hoggarth
                        Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 12:45 PM
                        To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
                        Subject: [gnso-osc] OSC - Communications Work
Team Draft Charter - Clean and Redline Versions
                        
                        
                        Dear OSC Members:
                        
                        Pursuant to my previous message, attached please
find the clean and red-line versions of the Draft Charter for the
Communications Work Team.
                        
                        Look forward to talking with you all on Monday.
                        
                        Best regards,
                        
                        Rob Hoggarth